Cited by 77Wound Healing and TreatmentsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Effect of pore size and cross-linking of a novel collagen-elastin dermal substitute on wound healing

Boekema, Bouke K. H. L., Vlig, Marcel, Olde Damink, Leon, Middelkoop, Esther, Eummelen, Lizette, Bühren, Anne V., Ulrich, Magda M. W.·2014·Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Abstract

Collagen-elastin (CE) scaffolds are frequently used for dermal replacement in the treatment of full-thickness skin defects such as burn wounds. But little is known about the optimal pore size and level of cross-linking. Different formulations of dermal substitutes with unidirectional pores were tested in porcine full-thickness wounds in combination with autologous split skin mesh grafts (SSG). Effect on wound healing was evaluated both macro- and microscopically. CE scaffolds with a pore size of 80 or 100 μm resulted in good wound healing after one-stage grafting. Application of scaffolds with a larger average pore size (120 μm) resulted in more myofibroblasts and more foreign body giant cells (FBGC). Moderate crosslinking impaired wound healing as it resulted in more wound contraction, more FBGC and increased epidermal thickness compared to no cross-linking. In addition, take rate and redness were negatively affected compared to SSG only. Vascularization and the number of myofibroblasts were not affected by cross-linking. Surprisingly, stability of cross-linked scaffolds was not increased in the wound environment, in contrast to in vitro results. Cross-linking reduced the proliferation of fibroblasts in vitro, which might explain the reduced clinical outcome. The non-cross-linked CE substitute with unidirectional pores allowed one-stage grafting of SSG, resulting in good wound healing. In addition, only a very mild foreign body reaction was observed. Cross-linking of CE scaffolds negatively affected wound healing on several important parameters. The optimal non-cross-linked CE substitute is a promising candidate for future clinical evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10856-013-5075-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excessive crosslinking, particularly with chemical agents, impairs biodegradability and promotes a higher M1/M2 macrophage ratio, leading to increased inflammation and foreign body reaction compared to a non-crosslinked scaffold.

    “While it helps reduce immunogenicity by restoring structural integrity after decellularization, excessive crosslinking-particularly with chemical agents-impairs biodegradability [135,136] and promotes a higher M1/M2 macrophage ratio, leading to increased inflammation and FBR compared to a non-crosslinked scaffold [137].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 77

Authors
Boekema, B. K. H. L., Vlig, M., Olde Damink, L., Middelkoop, E., Eummelen, L., Bühren, A. V., & Ulrich, M. M. W.
Affiliations
Association of Dutch Burn Centres (NL)
Corresponding author
Boekema, Bouke K. H. L.
Venue
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
423-433
ISSN
  • 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4838
OpenAlex
W2058803560
Cited by
77
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
skin substitutes, pore size, crosslinking, wound healing, full-thickness skin defect, burn wounds, split-thickness skin graft, foreign body giant cells, myofibroblasts, scaffold stability, fibroblast proliferation, vascularization, foreign body reaction
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Elastin, Foreign-Body Reaction, Wound Healing, Skin, Artificial, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review