Effect of pore size and cross-linking of a novel collagen-elastin dermal substitute on wound healing
Abstract
Collagen-elastin (CE) scaffolds are frequently used for dermal replacement in the treatment of full-thickness skin defects such as burn wounds. But little is known about the optimal pore size and level of cross-linking. Different formulations of dermal substitutes with unidirectional pores were tested in porcine full-thickness wounds in combination with autologous split skin mesh grafts (SSG). Effect on wound healing was evaluated both macro- and microscopically. CE scaffolds with a pore size of 80 or 100 μm resulted in good wound healing after one-stage grafting. Application of scaffolds with a larger average pore size (120 μm) resulted in more myofibroblasts and more foreign body giant cells (FBGC). Moderate crosslinking impaired wound healing as it resulted in more wound contraction, more FBGC and increased epidermal thickness compared to no cross-linking. In addition, take rate and redness were negatively affected compared to SSG only. Vascularization and the number of myofibroblasts were not affected by cross-linking. Surprisingly, stability of cross-linked scaffolds was not increased in the wound environment, in contrast to in vitro results. Cross-linking reduced the proliferation of fibroblasts in vitro, which might explain the reduced clinical outcome. The non-cross-linked CE substitute with unidirectional pores allowed one-stage grafting of SSG, resulting in good wound healing. In addition, only a very mild foreign body reaction was observed. Cross-linking of CE scaffolds negatively affected wound healing on several important parameters. The optimal non-cross-linked CE substitute is a promising candidate for future clinical evaluation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excessive crosslinking, particularly with chemical agents, impairs biodegradability and promotes a higher M1/M2 macrophage ratio, leading to increased inflammation and foreign body reaction compared to a non-crosslinked scaffold.
“While it helps reduce immunogenicity by restoring structural integrity after decellularization, excessive crosslinking-particularly with chemical agents-impairs biodegradability [135,136] and promotes a higher M1/M2 macrophage ratio, leading to increased inflammation and FBR compared to a non-crosslinked scaffold [137].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [135]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Boekema, B. K. H. L., Vlig, M., Olde Damink, L., Middelkoop, E., Eummelen, L., Bühren, A. V., & Ulrich, M. M. W.
- Affiliations
- Association of Dutch Burn Centres (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boekema, Bouke K. H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 423-433
- ISSN
- 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4838
- OpenAlex
- W2058803560
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- skin substitutes, pore size, crosslinking, wound healing, full-thickness skin defect, burn wounds, split-thickness skin graft, foreign body giant cells, myofibroblasts, scaffold stability, fibroblast proliferation, vascularization, foreign body reaction
- MeSH terms
- Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Elastin, Foreign-Body Reaction, Wound Healing, Skin, Artificial, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review