Relationships between mathematical knowledge for teaching and teaching practice: the case of proof
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers might not always demonstrate all MKT subdomains in one practice.
“Thus, as Steele and Rogers (2012) suggested, teachers might not always demonstrate all MKT subdomains in one practice.”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Steele and Rogers (2012)
Multiple forms of practice optimize PMTs' opportunities to demonstrate MKT.
“Even though we do not argue for investigating MKT through assessment, we agree with Steele and Rogers in that multiple forms of practice optimize PMTs' opportunities to demonstrate MKT.”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Steele and Rogers (2012)
Cites
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812 · see citing works
Stylianides, A. J. (2007) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/30034869 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Facilitating the Transition from Empirical Arguments to Proof
Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0314 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection
Sapkota, B., & Hayes, A. H. (2024) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12644 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Steele, M. D., & Rogers, K. C.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Steele, Michael D.
- Venue
- Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
- Published
- 2012-01-26
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-180
- ISSN
- 1386-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1820
- OpenAlex
- W2096879825
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- mathematical knowledge for teaching, proof, reasoning and proving, secondary mathematics teachers, clinical evaluation, teacher knowledge assessment, student positioning, learning opportunities, teacher professional development, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
