The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks
Open accessAbstract
A new program, TALOS-N, is introduced for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. The program relies far more extensively on the use of trained artificial neural networks than its predecessor, TALOS+. Validation on an independent set of proteins indicates that backbone torsion angles can be predicted for a larger, ≥90 % fraction of the residues, with an error rate smaller than ca 3.5 %, using an acceptance criterion that is nearly two-fold tighter than that used previously, and a root mean square difference between predicted and crystallographically observed (ϕ, ψ) torsion angles of ca 12º. TALOS-N also reports sidechain χ1 rotameric states for about 50 % of the residues, and a consistency with reference structures of 89 %. The program includes a neural network trained to identify secondary structure from residue sequence and chemical shifts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology
Cornilescu, G., Delaglio, F., & Bax, A. (1999) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1023/a:1008392405740 · Cited by 2,957 · cited 9×
“…protein database for closely matching fragments was at the heart of the earlier TALOS and TALOS+ programs for predicting backbone φ/ψ angles, and provides a robust quality control step by eliminating local geometries that are sterically not feasible (Cornilescu et al. 1999; Shen et al. 2009a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShapovalov, M. V., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.03.019 · Cited by 1,000
Cited by
Advances in protein structure prediction and design
Kuhlman, B., & Bradley, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x · Cited by 806
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629
De novo protein design enables the precise induction of RSV-neutralizing antibodies
Sesterhenn, F., Yang, C., Bonet, J., Cramer, J. T., Wen, X., Wang, Y., Chiang, C.-I., Abriata, L. A., Kucharska, I., Castoro, G., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay5051 · Cited by 191
Teixobactin kills bacteria by a two-pronged attack on the cell envelope
Shukla, R., Lavore, F., Maity, S., Derks, M. G. N., Jones, C. R., Vermeulen, B. J. A., Melcrová, A., Morris, M. A., Becker, L. M., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05019-y · Cited by 201
Structural insights into p300 regulation and acetylation-dependent genome organisation
Ibrahim, Z., Wang, T., Destaing, O., Salvi, N., Hoghoughi, N., Chabert, C., Rusu, A., Gao, J., Feletto, L., Reynoird, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35375-2 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., & Bax, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR
- Published
- 2013-06-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-241
- ISSN
- 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5001
- OpenAlex
- W2167785149
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
