The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of order parameters based on protein NMR structure ensemble and machine learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The fast motions of proteins at the picosecond to nanosecond timescale, known as fast dynamics, are closely related to protein conformational entropy and rearrangement, which in turn affect catalysis, ligand binding and protein allosteric effects. The most used NMR approach to study fast protein dynamics is the model free method, which uses order parameter S 2 to describe the amplitude of the internal motion of local group. However, to obtain order parameter through NMR experiments is quite complex and lengthy. In this paper, we present a machine learning approach for predicting backbone 1 H-15 N order parameters based on protein NMR structure ensemble. A random forest model is used to learn the relationship between order parameters and structural features. Our method achieves high accuracy in predicting backbone 1 H-15 N order parameters for a test dataset of 10 proteins, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.817 and a root-mean-square error of 0.131.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 4×
“For a protein consisting of 85 residues, running one time of AlphaFold structure prediction on Google’s Colaboratory takes about 3 minutes.”
InfluentialKabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320 · cited 2×
“The SASA feature of the target residue is the estimated number of water molecules in contact with the residue, and calculated from protein 3D structure using the DSSP program (Kabsch and Sander 1983).”
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M., & Farhan, L. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 · Cited by 7,906 · cited 1×
“The most remarkable branch of machine learning is deep learning (Alzubaidi et al. 2021), which has been widely applied in areas such as image recognition, natural language processing, and more (Chao et al. 2022).”
Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 · Cited by 4,149 · cited 1×
“Random forest is a general-purpose classification and regression method proposed by L. Breiman in 2001 (Biau and Scornet 2016; Breiman 2001).”
Lipari, G., & Szabo, A. (1982) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00381a009 · Cited by 3,777 · cited 1×
“The model-free method is the most used NMR approach to study fast protein dynamics (Clore et al. 1990; Lipari and Szabo 1982a, 1982b), and it separates protein motion into two independent parts, namely global and internal motion.”
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842
Lipari, G., & Szabó, A. (1982) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00381a010 · Cited by 1,560 · cited 2×
“Among those model-free parameters, order parameter is the most important one, which is a measure of the degree of alignment of the N-H or C-H bond vector with the principal axis of the molecular frame.”
Clore, G. M., Szabo, A., Bax, A., Kay, L. E., Driscoll, P. C., & Gronenborn, A. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00168a070 · Cited by 1,046 · cited 1×
“The model-free method is the most used NMR approach to study fast protein dynamics (Clore et al. 1990; Lipari and Szabo 1982a, 1982b), and it separates protein motion into two independent parts, namely global and internal motion.”
An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics
Kleckner, I. R., & Foster, M. P. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012 · Cited by 610 · cited 2×
“…(NMR) is a powerful tool for studying the structure, dynamics, and interaction of proteins at atomic resolution (Gobl et al. 2014; Cala et al. 2014; Kleckner and Foster 2011), and can be used to investigate protein dynamics behavior across almost all time scales (Grimaldo et al. 2019; Kovermann et…”
Zhou, Z.-H. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3 · Cited by 564 · cited 2×
“Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that learn patterns, relationships, and insights from data, and then use this information to make decisions or predictions without being explicitly programmed (Zhou 2021).”
Jarymowycz, V. A., & Stone, M. J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040421p · Cited by 370 · cited 2×
“…fast motions of proteins at the picosecond to nanosec-ond timescale, known as fast dynamics, are closely related to protein conformational entropy and rearrangement, which in turn affect catalysis, ligand binding and protein allosteric effects (Jarymowycz and Stone 2006; Tzeng and Kalodimos 2011).”
Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank
Hoch, J. C., Baskaran, K., Burr, H., Chin, J., Eghbalnia, H. R., Fujiwara, T., Gryk, M. R., Iwata, T., Kojima, C., Kurisu, G., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1050 · Cited by 290
Protein dynamics and allostery: an NMR view
Tzeng, S., & Kalodimos, C. G. (2010) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2010.10.007 · Cited by 258 · cited 1×
“…fast motions of proteins at the picosecond to nanosec-ond timescale, known as fast dynamics, are closely related to protein conformational entropy and rearrangement, which in turn affect catalysis, ligand binding and protein allosteric effects (Jarymowycz and Stone 2006; Tzeng and Kalodimos 2011).”
NMR approaches for structural analysis of multidomain proteins and complexes in solution
Göbl, C., Madl, T., Simon, B., & Sattler, M. (2014) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2014.05.003 · Cited by 183 · cited 1×
“…magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is a powerful tool for studying the structure, dynamics, and interaction of proteins at atomic resolution (Gobl et al. 2014; Cala et al. 2014; Kleckner and Foster 2011), and can be used to investigate protein dynamics behavior across almost all time scales…”
Protein dynamics and function from solution state NMR spectroscopy
Kovermann, M., Rogne, P., & Wolf‐Watz, M. (2016) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583516000019 · Cited by 177 · cited 2×
“The dynamics of proteins is extremely complex, spanning several orders of magnitude in time scale, from picoseconds to seconds (Kovermann et al. 2016; Ortega et al. 2013).”
Model-free analysis of protein backbone motion from residual dipolar couplings.
Peti, W., Meiler, J., Brüschweiler, R., & Griesinger, C. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja011883c · Cited by 168 · cited 1×
“It should be noted that, the dynamic time scale of order parameters could be extended from ps-ns to ps-ms range by measuring NH residual dipolar couplings in multiple alignments (Peti et al. 2002).”
NMR-based analysis of protein–ligand interactions
Cala, O., Guillière, F., & Krimm, I. (2014) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-013-6931-0 · Cited by 153 · cited 1×
“…spectroscopy (NMR) is a powerful tool for studying the structure, dynamics, and interaction of proteins at atomic resolution (Gobl et al. 2014; Cala et al. 2014; Kleckner and Foster 2011), and can be used to investigate protein dynamics behavior across almost all time scales (Grimaldo et al.…”
From protein sequence to dynamics and disorder with DynaMine
Cilia, E., Pancsa, R., Tompa, P., Lenaerts, T., & Vranken, W. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3741 · Cited by 153 · cited 1×
“Cilia et al proposed a linear model DynaMine which only uses protein sequence information as input to predict protein order parameters (Cilia et al. 2013).”
Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility.
Andersen, C. A., Palmer, A., Brunak, S., & Rost, B. (2002) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00700-1 · Cited by 153 · cited 2×
“These structures in the ensemble represent potential conformations that the protein can adopt, and the variations of those conformations contain rich dynamic information, as Andersen and Palmer et al pointed out 20 years ago (Andersen et al. 2002).”
Dynamics of proteins in solution
Grimaldo, M., Roosen‐Runge, F., Zhang, F., Schreiber, F., & Seydel, T. (2019) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583519000027 · Cited by 144 · cited 2×
“Therefore, measuring and studying protein dynamics is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying protein function and related drug design (Sekhar and Kay 2019; Grimaldo et al. 2019).”
An NMR View of Protein Dynamics in Health and Disease.
Sekhar, A., & Kay, L. (2019) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115647 · Cited by 143 · cited 1×
“Therefore, measuring and studying protein dynamics is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying protein function and related drug design (Sekhar and Kay 2019; Grimaldo et al. 2019).”
Contact model for the prediction of NMR N-H order parameters in globular proteins.
Zhang, F., & Brüschweiler, R. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja027847a · Cited by 97
NMR: prediction of protein flexibility
Berjanskii, M. V., & Wishart, D. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.108 · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“Berjanskii et al. introduced the RCI (random coil index) as an index to quantify the flexibility of a protein based from the secondary chemical shifts of the backbone atoms, and proposed a formula to predict order parameter from RCI (Berjanskii and Wishart 2006).”
On the relation between residue flexibility and local solvent accessibility in proteins
Zhang, H., Zhang, T., Chen, K., Shen, S., Ruan, J., & Kurgan, L. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22375 · Cited by 79 · cited 1×
“Zhang et al found that SASA has close relationship with residue flexibility (Zhang et al. 2009).”
Predicting protein flexibility with AlphaFold
Ma, P., Li, D., & Brüschweiler, R. (2023) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26471 · Cited by 72 · cited 2×
“As mentioned earlier, WCN is currently the best-performing method for protein order parameter prediction (Huang et al. 2008), while cdsAF2 is the most recently proposed order parameter prediction method (Ma et al. 2023).”
A method for validating the accuracy of NMR protein structures
Fowler, N., Sljoka, A., & Williamson, M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20177-1 · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“Recently, Fowler et al. also employed protein structure ensemble to assess the performance of the method they proposed for validating protein structure accuracy (Fowler et al. 2020).”
Ming, D., & Brüschweiler, R. (2006) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.071902 · Cited by 28 · cited 2×
“For example, the highest Pearson correlation coefficient reported between predicted and experimental values for order parameters is 0.79, obtained by the WCN method (Ming and Bruschweiler 2006).”
InfluentialProtein Dynamics as Reported by NMR
Gáspári, Z., & Perczel, A. (2010) · Annual reports on NMR spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-089054-8.00002-2 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“…of proteins at atomic resolution (Gobl et al. 2014; Cala et al. 2014; Kleckner and Foster 2011), and can be used to investigate protein dynamics behavior across almost all time scales (Grimaldo et al. 2019; Kovermann et al. 2016; Kleckner and Foster 2011; Gáspári and Perczel 2010; Hu and Jin 2022).”
Prediction of NMR order parameters in proteins using weighted protein contact-number model
Huang, S.-W., Shih, C.-H., Lin, C., & Hwang, J. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-008-0465-0 · Cited by 15 · cited 4×
“Similar to CM, Huang et al. proposed a weighted contact number model (WCN) to calculate 1 H-15 N order parameters only using contacted Cα atoms (Huang et al. 2008).”
InfluentialProtein conformational flexibility prediction using machine learning.
Trott, O., Siggers, K., Rost, B., & Palmer, A. (2008) · Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. 1997 : Print) · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2008.01.011 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“Trott et al. trained a simple neural network to predict backbone 1 H-15 N order parameters from the three-dimensional structures of proteins using a data set of 16 proteins (Trott et al. 2008).”
Conformational dynamics in GPCR signaling by NMR
Hu, Y.-F., & Jin, C. (2022) · Magnetic Resonance Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mrl.2022.06.006 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“…of proteins at atomic resolution (Gobl et al. 2014; Cala et al. 2014; Kleckner and Foster 2011), and can be used to investigate protein dynamics behavior across almost all time scales (Grimaldo et al. 2019; Kovermann et al. 2016; Kleckner and Foster 2011; Gáspári and Perczel 2010; Hu and Jin 2022).”
Prediction of protein flexibility using a conformationally restrained contact map
Vera, R., Synsmir-Zizzamia, M., Ojinnaka, S., & Snyder, D. A. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25591 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“…restrained contact map (CoRe-CMap) model for predicting protein motion from sequence, which combines residuewise predictions of protein disorder likelihood with likelihoods of inter-residue contacts obtained from contact map-based protein structure prediction methods (Vera et al. 2018).”
Facilitating spectral analyses, simplification, and new tools through deep neural networks
Chao, F.-A., Zhang, Y., & Byrd, R. (2022) · Magnetic Resonance Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mrl.2021.12.001 · Cited by 2 · cited 2×
“For example, the highest Pearson correlation coefficient reported between predicted and experimental values for order parameters is 0.79, obtained by the WCN method (Ming and Bruschweiler 2006).”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32 · DOI · Paper page
- Ortega G, Pons M, Millet O (2013) Chapter Six – Protein functional dynamics in multiple timescales as studied by NMR spectroscopy. In: T Karabencheva-Christova (ed) Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, vol 92. Academic Press, pp 219–251 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning in NMR spectroscopy.
Klukowski, P., Riek, R., & Güntert, P. (2025) · Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000746342 · Cited by 31
“In a recent study, Wang et al. [110] proposed a machine learning solution that facilitates studies of fast dynamics (picosecond-nano-second timescale).”
Turhan, E., Pötzl, C., Brandis, D., Faglia, F., Zachrdla, M., & Kurzbach, D. (2025) · Chemistry · doi:10.1002/chem.202502067 · Cited by 5
“33–43] In particular, intriguing approaches have been reported in structure prediction [40,44] and line shape improvements [45–47] .”
Computation of 1H NMR chemical shifts: structural assessment of energetic materials
Mohnish, M., Ramavath, V., Ghule, V., & Sarangapani, R. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-025-06448-y · Cited by 5
Toyama, Y., Takeuchi, K., & Shimada, I. (2025) · Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. 1997 : Print) · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2025.108006 · Cited by 2
A Channel-Attention Convolutional Neural Network for Protein-DNA Binding Residue Prediction
Song, J., Song, C., Zhang, C., & Jiang, J.-Q. (2024) · 2024 International Conference on New Trends in Computational Intelligence (NTCI) · doi:10.1109/ntci64025.2024.10776294 · Cited by 1
Zhai, Y., Chen, Y.-X., Luo, J.-J., Ma, M.-Y., & Liu, F. (2026) · Chemické zvesti · doi:10.1007/s11696-026-05445-6
Research on Prediction Algorithm of Active Sites of BRET Protein Based on Deep Learning
Shan, G., & Shu, S. (2024) · 2024 3rd International Conference on Data Analytics, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICDACAI) · doi:10.1109/icdacai65086.2024.00122
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., Miao, Z., Xiao, X., Zhang, X., Yang, D., Jiang, B., & Liu, M.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics (CN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Jiang, Bin
- Liu, Maili
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR
- Published
- 2024-03-26
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-94
- ISSN
- 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5001
- OpenAlex
- W4393201605
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0704002, 2018YFE0202300)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21991081, 21921004, 21974149, 22327901)
- The Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB0540301)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Keywords
- random forest, model-independent analysis, conformational entropy
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review