Cited by 350Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Is Spirituality a Critical Ingredient of Meditation? Comparing the Effects of Spiritual Meditation, Secular Meditation, and Relaxation on Spiritual, Psychological, Cardiac, and Pain Outcomes

Wachholtz, Amy B., Pargament, Kenneth I.·2005·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This study compared secular and spiritual forms of meditation to assess the benefits of a spiritual intervention. Participants were taught a meditation or relaxation technique to practice for 20 min a day for two weeks. After two weeks, participants returned to the lab, practiced their technique for 20 min, and placed their hand in a cold-water bath of 2 degrees C for as long as they could endure it. The length of time that individuals kept their hand in the water bath was measured. Pain, anxiety, mood, and the spiritual health were assessed following the two-week intervention. Significant interactions occurred (time x group); the Spiritual Meditation group had greater decreases in anxiety and more positive mood, spiritual health, and spiritual experiences than the other two groups. They also tolerated pain almost twice as long as the other two groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-005-9008-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S or reduced pain in response to an R/S intervention).

    “Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S [534] or reduced pain in response to a R/S intervention [535–542]), while three (20%) reported positive relationships (worse pain in the more R/S) [543–545].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 350

Authors
Wachholtz, A. B., & Pargament, K. I.
Affiliations
Bowling Green State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wachholtz, Amy B.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
369-384
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2081357547
Cited by
350
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spiritual meditation, relaxation techniques, spiritual health, pain tolerance, cold pressor test, anxiety, mood, spiritual experience, cardiac outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Muscle Relaxation, Mysticism, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Pain Threshold, Meditation, Spirituality, Secularism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review