Cited by 233Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMigraine and Headache StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Migraines and meditation: does spirituality matter?

Wachholtz, Amy B., Pargament, Kenneth I.·2008·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Migraine headaches are associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety (Waldie and Poulton Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 72: 86-92, 2002) and feelings of low self-efficacy (French et al. Headache, 40: 647-656, 2000). Previous research suggests that spiritual meditation may ameliorate some of the negative traits associated with migraine headaches (Wachholtz and Pargament Journal of behavioral Medicine, 30: 311-318, 2005). This study examined two primary questions: (1) Is spiritual meditation more effective in enhancing pain tolerance and reducing migraine headache related symptoms than secular meditation and relaxation? and, (2) Does spiritual meditation create better mental, physical, and spiritual health outcomes than secular meditation and relaxation techniques? Eighty-three meditation naïve, frequent migraineurs were taught Spiritual Meditation, Internally Focused Secular Meditation, Externally Focused Secular Meditation, or Muscle Relaxation which participants practiced for 20 min a day for one month. Pre-post tests measured pain tolerance (with a cold pressor task), headache frequency, and mental and spiritual health variables. Compared to the other three groups, those who practiced spiritual meditation had greater decreases in the frequency of migraine headaches, anxiety, and negative affect, as well as greater increases in pain tolerance, headache-related self-efficacy, daily spiritual experiences, and existential well being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-008-9159-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher on R/S and anxiety, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships and seven (10%) found positive relationships.

    “Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships [173–182] and seven (10%) found positive relationships (greater anxiety among the more R/S) [183–189].”
  • Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S or reduced pain in response to an R/S intervention).

    “Of the 18 best studies, nine (50%) reported inverse relationships (less pain among the more R/S [534] or reduced pain in response to a R/S intervention [535–542]), while three (20%) reported positive relationships (worse pain in the more R/S) [543–545].”
  • In an early study of 382 adults with musculoskeletal complaints, R/S coping was the most common strategy for dealing with pain and was considered the second most helpful among coping behaviors.

    “For example, in an early study of 382 adults with musculoskeletal complains, R/S coping was the most common strategy for dealing with pain and was considered the second most helpful in a long list of coping behaviors [531].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 233

Authors
Wachholtz, A. B., & Pargament, K. I.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Wachholtz, Amy B.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2008-06-13
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
351-366
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W1974933102
Cited by
233
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
migraine, spiritual meditation, muscle relaxation, pain tolerance, headache frequency, anxiety, negative affect, spiritual health, existential well-being, depression
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Migraine Disorders, Pain Measurement, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Relaxation Therapy, Religion and Psychology, Meditation, Self Efficacy, Spirituality, Illness Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review