Six month post-treatment deterioration in acceptance (CPAQ-8) and cognitions following multidisciplinary pain treatment
Abstract
Pain acceptance contributes significantly to the effectiveness of pain treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, little research has been conducted to examine whether a decrease in acceptance contributes to a deterioration in post treatment functioning. The aim of this study was to assess the role of pain acceptance in relation to process and outcome variables in the six-months following the conclusion of a pain program. Adults with chronic pain (N = 120) completed assessments at the completion of a 3-week multidisciplinary treatment program and 6-months post-treatment. Process measures included the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8); the catastrophizing scale of the Pain Response Self-Statement Scale; the coping cognitions scale of the Pain Response Self-Statement Scale; and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Outcome measures included the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; the depression scale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; and two measures of physical functioning. Deterioration in acceptance of pain was significantly associated with deterioration in depression and disability, even when catastrophizing cognitions and kinesiophobia were accounted for. Decrease in acceptance was the strongest predictor of reliable deterioration in depression and disability. Results indicated the CPAQ-8 has utility as a measure for monitoring patient functioning post-treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CPAQ-8 is a significant predictor of reliable change in depression, anxiety, and disability in populations of patients with chronic pain, above that of pain intensity alone.
“is a significant predictor of reliable change in depression, anxiety and disability in populations of patients with chronic pain, above that of pain intensity alone. 26”
From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Pain acceptance will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8).
“Pain acceptance will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8). The outcome represents the mental influence of pain. Two factors are contained in the scale: activity engagement and pain willingness. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain acceptance [31].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Baranoff, J., Hanrahan, S. J., Kapur, D., & Connor, J. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Baranoff, John
- Venue
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Published
- 2013-03-16
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-479
- ISSN
- 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3521
- OpenAlex
- W2021975425
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- pain acceptance, multidisciplinary pain management, chronic pain, depression, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, physical function, treatment outcome monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review