Cited by 21Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlStress Responses and CortisolStudent Stress and Coping

Relationships between respiratory sinus arrhythmia and stress in college students.

Open access
Fanning, J., Silfer, J. L., Liu, H., Gauvin, L., Heilman, K. J., Porges, S. W., Rejeski, W. J.·2020·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between university students' respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) profiles and both retrospective and momentary ratings of stress. Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory health science course (N = 64). Participants provided RSA data at rest (tonic) and following an orthostatic challenge (phasic), completed the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and completed 6 daily ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of stress for 1 week. Higher tonic RSA was associated with lower perceived stress assessed via PSS and average EMA responses. Those with higher tonic RSA did not differ in their experience of stress across the week, whereas those with lower tonic RSA experienced increased stress across the week, and these trajectories varied as a function of phasic responses. These findings suggest a need for greater emphasis on behavioral strategies for maintaining and enhancing autonomic nervous system health among college students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-019-00103-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indices of autonomic state influenced the impact of the pandemic on mental health, perceived stress in college students, effectiveness of neurostimulation on abdominal pain, calming behavior in infants following the still face procedure, and protest behaviors in infants in daycare settings.

    “recent research documents that indices of autonomic state influenced the impact the pandemic on mental health (see Kolacz et al., 2020a), perceived stress in college students (Fanning et al., 2020), effectiveness of neurostimulation on abdominal pain (Kovacic et al., 2020), calming behavior in infants following the still face procedure (Kolacz et al., 2022), and protest behaviors in infants in day”

    From Polyvagal Theory: A Science of Safety (2022) · cites this paper as Fanning et al., 2020

    The Abstract and Discussion report that higher tonic respiratory sinus arrhythmia was associated with lower perceived stress among college students, and that stress trajectories differed by RSA profile. The paper describes relationships, not evidence that autonomic state caused or influenced perceived stress; the other outcomes in the citing sentence are attributed to other sources. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inhales increase heart rate and exhales decrease heart rate via respiratory sinus arrhythmia.

    “Inhales increase heart rate and exhales decrease heart rate via respiratory sinus arrhythmia36—a normal phenomenon that relates to the effects of breathing on intrathoracic pressure, diaphragmatic movement, heart volume/blood flow rates, and compensatory shifts in vagal activation.37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thayer JF, & Lane RD (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 201– 216. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4 11163422 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Fanning, J., Silfer, J. L., Liu, H., Gauvin, L., Heilman, K. J., Porges, S. W., & Rejeski, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Fanning, J.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2019-10-12
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
308-317
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2979432981
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R21AG058249, P30AG021332)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
respiratory sinus arrhythmia, perceived stress, university students, autonomic nervous system, orthostatic challenge, ecological momentary assessment, stress trajectories, health sciences students
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Students, Young Adult, Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review