The Attention Training Technique as an Attempt to Decrease Intrusive Thoughts in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (OCD): From Cognitive Theory to Practice and Back
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A subsequent study using a clinical population found ABM alone did not reduce OCD symptoms, suggesting it may be more effective in addition to ERP rather than in place of it.
“However, a subsequent study using a clinical population found that ABM alone did not reduce OCD symptoms, thus suggesting that it may be more effective in addition to ERP rather than in place of it.[53]”
From Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and new directions (2019) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Moritz, S., Wess, N., Treszl, A., & Jelinek, L.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Moritz, Steffen
- Venue
- Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
- Published
- 2010-12-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 135-143
- ISSN
- 0022-0116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3564
- OpenAlex
- W2025113779
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, intrusive thoughts, bibliotherapy, cognitive remediation, attentional bias, treatment effectiveness, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review