Cited by 33Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effects of Dialectical Behavior Therapy on Emotion Regulation, Distress Tolerance, Craving, and Depression in Patients with Opioid Dependence Disorder

Rezaie, Zeinab, Afshari, Behrooz, Balagabri, Zohreh·2025·Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10879-020-09487-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Rezaie, Z., Afshari, B., & Balagabri, Z.
Affiliations
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Farhangian University (IR)
Corresponding author
Rezaie, Zeinab
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
Published
2021-02-04
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
163-172
ISSN
  • 0022-0116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3564
OpenAlex
W3127039115
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, methadone maintenance treatment, opioid use disorder, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, craving, depression, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review