Cited by 12Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Feeling Good Despite EDS: The Effects of a 5-Week Online Positive Psychology Programme for Ehlers–Danlos-Syndromes Patients

Open access
Kalisch, Larissa, Boniwell, Ilona, Osin, Evgeny, Baeza-Velasco, Carolina·2022·Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Abstract

Ehlers-Danlos-Syndromes (EDS) is a group of hereditary, chronic and potentially disabling conditions. Few studies have tested the effects of psychological interventions to increase well-being in this population. We hypothesized that Positive Psychology Interventions (PPI), first applied to healthy and mentally ill subjects, can also be useful for people with somatic conditions and conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of a 5-week online PPI designed to improve well-being in EDS patients. A sample of 132 EDS patients were allocated to three groups: assigned PPI, self-selected PPI, and waitlist control-group (WLC). Measures of positive and negative affect, pain disability, fatigue, and life satisfaction were administered before program start, 6 weeks later, and 1 month later. Satisfaction with the program was also evaluated. The results revealed that participants in the self-selected PPI-group, but not in the assigned PPI group, reported significantly lower levels of fatigue and higher levels of positive affect and life satisfaction compared to WLC after 6 weeks. There were no effects on negative affect and pain disability measures. Finally, 77% of the participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the program. These findings confirm and extend previous research by showing the efficacy of PPI for people with chronic illness under the condition that individuals can choose the program content. From a healthcare perspective, online PPIs could complement treatments aimed at symptom reduction and increase well-being in patients with EDS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10879-021-09521-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review may have missed interventions that were subsequently conducted and published, such as the online RCT by Kalisch and colleagues.

    “We acknowledge that we may have missed interventions that were subsequently conducted and published, such as the online RCT by Kalisch and colleagues [70].”

    From Psychological interventions for individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Method section (Participants, Design, and Procedure; page unavailable) identifies this as an online intervention study with two intervention groups and a waitlist control. It says participants were systematically allocated to groups based on their order of inclusion, not randomly assigned, so the description of it as an RCT is not supported. Whether the citing review missed the study is the citing authors’ own qualification, not a claim this source can establish. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hefferon, K., & Boniwell, I. (2011a). Chapter 1: Introduction to positive psychology. In Positive psychology: Theory, research and applications. (pp. 1–21). McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=729517.
  2. Hefferon, K., & Boniwell, I. (2011b). Chapter 8: Positive psychology interventions. In Positive psychology: Theory, research and applications (pp. 150–174). McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=729517.

Metadata

Authors
Kalisch, L., Boniwell, I., Osin, E., & Baeza-Velasco, C.
Affiliations
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kalisch, Larissa
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
Published
2021-10-15
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
79-87
ISSN
  • 0022-0116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3564
OpenAlex
W3205945178
Cited by
12
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, positive psychology interventions, online psychological intervention, well-being, fatigue, life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, pain-related disability, chronic disease, program satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review