Cited by 26Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatments

Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Psychosocial Perspective

Delaney, Mary, Leroi, Iracema, Simpson, Jane, Overton, Paul Geoffrey·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease primarily characterised by motor symptoms. However, another feature of PD which is receiving increasing attention is the phenomenon of impulse control disorders (ICDs), such as pathological gambling. To date, research into ICDs in PD has centred on a biomedical model of cause, related to the effects of dopamine replacement therapy. However, there are several areas of discrepancy in the current biomedical account of ICDs in PD. In addition, we argue that social and psychological factors also need to be considered to achieve a more complete understanding of the phenomenon. We present a novel conceptual model which combines biomedical and psychosocial factors in the genesis of ICDs in PD and use the model to identify a number of potential treatment intervention points and to highlight important outstanding questions concerning the inter-relationship between psychosocial and biomedical factors in the genesis of ICDs in PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-012-9302-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delaney, M., Leroi, I., Simpson, J., & Overton, P. G.
Affiliations
  • Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Overton, Paul Geoffrey
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2012-05-12
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
338-346
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2149734456
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Parkinson's UK (F-0606)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, impulse control disorders, gambling addiction, dopamine replacement therapy, psychosocial factors, biomedical model, conceptual model, therapeutic interventions, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Antiparkinson Agents, Female, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Models, Psychological, Parkinson Disease, Stress, Psychological, Comorbidity, Dopamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review