Cited by 45Psychiatric care and mental health servicesInterprofessional Education and CollaborationMental Health Treatment and Access

The State and Future of the Primary Care Behavioral Health Model of Service Delivery Workforce

Serrano, Neftali, Cordes, Colleen, Cubic, Barbara, Daub, Suzanne·2018·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

The growth of the Primary Care Behavioral Health model (PCBH) nationally has highlighted and created a workforce development challenge given that most mental health professionals are not trained for primary care specialization. This work provides a review of the current efforts to retrain mental health professionals to fulfill roles as Behavioral Health Consultants (BHCs) including certificate programs, technical assistance programs, literature and on-the-job training, as well as detail the future needs of the workforce if the model is to sustainably proliferate. Eight recommendations are offered including: (1) the development of an interprofessional certification body for PCBH training criteria, (2) integration of PCBH model specific curricula in graduate studies, (3) integration of program development skill building in curricula, (4) efforts to develop faculty for PCBH model awareness, (5) intentional efforts to draw students to graduate programs for PCBH model training, (6) a national employment clearinghouse, (7) efforts to coalesce current knowledge around the provision of technical assistance to sites, and (8) workforce specific research efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-017-9491-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serrano, N., Cordes, C., Cubic, B., & Daub, S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Serrano, Neftali
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2017-05-15
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
157-168
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2614319998
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
behavioral health consultants, mental health workforce development, technical assistance, workforce recruitment and retention, primary care mental health
MeSH terms
Intersectoral Collaboration, Behavioral Medicine, Certification, Curriculum, Forecasting, Humans, Inservice Training, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, United States, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review