The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Chemical Communication between Plants and Bacteria through Airborne Signals: Induced Resistance by Bacterial Volatiles
Open accessAbstract
Certain plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) elicit induced systemic resistance (ISR) and plant growth promotion in the absence of physical contact with plants via volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. In this article, we review the recent progess made by research into the interactions between PGPR VOCs and plants, focusing on VOC emission by PGPR strains in plants. Particular attention is given to the mechanisms by which these bacterial VOCs elicit ISR. We provide an overview of recent progress in the elucidation of PGPR VOC interactions from studies utilizing transcriptome, metabolome, and proteome analyses. By monitoring defense gene expression patterns, performing 2-dimensional electrophoresis, and studying defense signaling null mutants, salicylic acid and ethylene have been found to be key players in plant signaling pathways involved in the ISR response. Bacterial VOCs also confer induced systemic tolerance to abiotic stresses, such as drought and heavy metals. A review of current analytical approaches for PGPR volatile profiling is also provided with needed future developments emphasized. To assess potential utilization of PGPR VOCs for crop plants, volatile suspensions have been applied to pepper and cucumber roots and found to be effective at protecting plants against plant pathogens and insect pests in the field. Taken together, these studies provide further insight into the biological and ecological potential of PGPR VOCs for enhancing plant self-immunity and/or adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses in modern agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Self-citationBacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationMarilley, L. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00304-0 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Harnessing rhizosphere microbiomes for drought-resilient crop production
de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., Knight, C. G., Nicolitch, O., & Williams, A. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz5192 · Cited by 911
Venturi, V., & Keel, C. (2016) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.005 · Cited by 674
Volatile affairs in microbial interactions
Schmidt, R., Cordovez, V., de Boer, W., Raaijmakers, J., & Garbeva, P. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.42 · Cited by 481
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture
Ruzzi, M., & Aroca, R. (2015) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.042 · Cited by 458
Rhizosphere microbiome: Engineering bacterial competitiveness for enhancing crop production
Kumar, A., & Dubey, A. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.014 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Farag, M. A., Zhang, H., & Ryu, C.-M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1007-1018
- ISSN
- 0098-0331 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1561
- OpenAlex
- W2133665825
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Chemical Communication between Plants and Bacteria through Airborne Signals: Induced Resistance by Bacterial Volatiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10886-013-0317-9
- The paper
- Farag, M. A., Zhang, H., & Ryu, C.-M. (2013). Dynamic Chemical Communication between Plants and Bacteria through Airborne Signals: Induced Resistance by Bacterial Volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0317-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.