Child Adjustment after Parental Separation: Variations by Gender, Age, and Maternal Experiences of Violence during Marriage
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After separation from an abusive partner, up to 90% of women report continued harassment, stalking or abuse.
“After separation from an abusive partner, up to 90% of women report continued harassment, stalking or abuse (Davies et al., 2009; Hardesty et al., 2012; Mitchell et al., 2021).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Mitchell et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Mitchell, E. T., Whittaker, A. M., Raffaelli, M., & Hardesty, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Indiana (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, Elissa Thomann
- Venue
- Journal of Family Violence
- Published
- 2021-02-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 979-989
- ISSN
- 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2851
- OpenAlex
- W3127969411
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD061559A)
- College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- parental separation, divorce, child adjustment, intimate partner violence, situational couple violence, gender differences, child age, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
