Cited by 13Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The use of children as a tactic of intimate partner violence and its impact on survivors’ mental health and well-being over time.

Open access
Sullivan, Cris M., Sprecher, Mackenzie, Guerrero, Mayra, Fernandez, Aileen, Simmons, Cortney·2024·Journal of Family Violence

Abstract

Purpose: This is the first study to longitudinally examine the mental health and well-being impacts on survivors when their abusive partners and ex-partners use their children as an abuse tactic against them. Methods: The sample included two hundred seventy-seven homeless or unstably housed survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). All were mothers of minor children. Participants were interviewed shortly after seeking services and again at 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, and 24-months. They were asked about abuse they had experienced in the past six months, including the ways children were used as a form of IPV. They were also asked about their current depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, as well as quality of life. Results: Many of the participants reported their abusive partners and ex-partners had used their children as a form of IPV to control or hurt them. Further, after controlling for other forms of abuse, use of the children significantly predicted increased anxiety, PTSD symptoms, and quality of life (but not depression) over time. Conclusion: It is important to recognize the widespread use of children as a common and injurious form of IPV, and its impact on the mental health and well-being of survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-022-00483-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perpetrators often employ a range of tactics, including intimidation, humiliation, economic control, and the manipulation of children to maintain dominance and undermine autonomy.

    “Perpetrators often employ a range of tactics, including intimidation, humiliation, economic control, and the manipulation of children to maintain dominance and undermine autonomy (Johnson, 2008; Sullivan et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, C. M., Sprecher, M., Guerrero, M., Fernandez, A., & Simmons, C.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Cris M.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2022-12-14
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W4311326473
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHSP233201600070C)
  • U.S. Department of Justice (HHSP233201600070C)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1117416)
  • Washington State University
  • Office for Victims of Crime (HHSP233201600070C)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, child abuse, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, quality of life, mothers, longitudinal outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review