Media Attention and Public Perceptions of Cancer and Eastern Equine Encephalitis
Abstract
Previous research has found that members of the public have a skewed sense of health risk. The purpose of this research was to investigate how mass media use influences perceptions of threat from cancer and eastern equine encephalitis (EEE). Investigators performed a media content analysis of 253 health-related articles from 11 Massachusetts newspapers, then used logistic regression to analyze responses to a health communication survey of 613 Massachusetts adults. A greater proportion of cancer articles compared to those about EEE mentioned progress in combating the disease (61.0% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.0001), while a greater proportion of EEE articles mentioned new incidents of illness (35.4%, vs. 4.6% P < 0.0001). Over half of all respondents perceived EEE as an equal or greater threat than cancer. Paying a lot of attention to health media was related to higher odds of perceiving EEE as a threat (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.03-4.45), and of perceiving EEE as a threat compared to cancer (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.24-3.84). Media treatment of health stories that emphasize the novelty and unpredictability of EEE compared to cancer may lead to distorted perceptions of threat among news consumers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of studies have shown that media use could influence perceived knowledge and intentions within the context of health.
“A number of studies have shown that media use could influence perceived knowledge and intentions within the context of health [34-36].”
From A Cross-Cultural Comparison of an Extended Planned Risk Information Seeking Model on Mental Health Among College Students: Cross-Sectional Study (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Niu, Z., Willoughby, J. F., Mei, J., Li, S., & Hu, P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15817 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ackerson, L. K., & Viswanath, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ackerson, Leland K.
- Venue
- Journal of Community Health
- Published
- 2010-03-30
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-416
- ISSN
- 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3610
- OpenAlex
- W1981007671
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Community Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- media attention, health risk perception, cancer, eastern equine encephalitis, media coverage of health, threat perception, mass media use, health communication, public perception of disease
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Newspapers as Topic, Perception, Public Opinion, Risk, Logistic Models, Encephalomyelitis, Eastern Equine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review