Cited by 89Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Examining Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Florida through a Socio-Ecological Lens

Daley, Ellen, Alio, Amina, Anstey, Erica H., Chandler, Rasheeta, Dyer, Karen, Helmy, Hannah·2011·Journal of Community Health

Abstract

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality have declined in the U.S. over the past 50 years because of broad screening efforts; however, some states continue to bear a greater burden due to under-screened and -treated populations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the socio-ecological model to examine barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida. A qualitative semi-structured interview guide was used to conduct telephone interviews with 21 purposively sampled health care professionals from 13 high-risk counties. Interviews were transcribed and coded using themes identified a priori based on levels of the socio-ecological model. Investigators identified barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida across four levels: (1) regulations and funding issues at the policy level are inconsistent between federal, state and local levels; (2) community level barriers range from cultural differences and fear of deportation, to transportation issues; (3) institutional level barriers complicate the administration of screening and treatment services; and (4) individual beliefs, behaviors, and stressors due to poverty hinder women's ability to access services. Many of our findings are consistent with previous studies that identified constraints to screening and treatment of cervical cancer, such as poverty and lack of access to care. This study adds to the literature by examining barriers from the viewpoint of service providers and program coordinators,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10900-010-9289-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daley, E., Alio, A., Anstey, E. H., Chandler, R., Dyer, K., & Helmy, H.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Daley, Ellen
Venue
Journal of Community Health
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
121-131
ISSN
  • 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3610
OpenAlex
W1997990631
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of South Florida
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer treatment, barriers to care, socio-ecological model, health care access, poverty, health policy, cultural barriers, fear of deportation, transportation barriers, healthcare workers, Florida
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Community Health Services, Cultural Characteristics, Female, Florida, Health Policy, Health Resources, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, Qualitative Research, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review