Promoting Volunteerism in Global Health: Lessons from a Medical Mission in Northern Mexico
Abstract
The challenges of meeting global health care needs in communities throughout the developing world are becoming increasingly complex. Understanding what motivates volunteers is important for organizations that seek to harness and develop long-term volunteers in order to meet the need for global health care services. Here we report a case study of a successful volunteer clinic that has provided medical, dental and surgical services to under-served residents of northern Mexico for more than 20 years. Our objective was to understand what promotes sustained volunteerism. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with students, residents, nurses, dentists, oral surgeons and community volunteers, in addition to four full days of participant observation. We analysed volunteers' experiences with a real-life global medical mission and offer recommendations. Motivating factors included psychological and emotional rewards, career-related benefits, opportunities for interpersonal interaction, the opportunity to serve disadvantaged communities and personal relevance of the mission. We demonstrate the paramount importance of volunteer-patient interaction, having a dedicated facilitator to recruit and pave the way for first-time volunteers and the value of using multiple recruitment strategies. Most important, we show that organizations must focus on facilitating first-time volunteers' experiences, particularly by ensuring that they are given specific roles and responsibilities, one of the best predictors of volunteer satisfaction and sustained volunteerism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies have indicated similar factors as the driving force behind volunteering, including willingness to help others, increase in social and personal knowledge, better job prospects, and improved overall wellbeing.
“Other studies have also indicated similar factors as the driving force behind volunteering. Factors such as willingness to help others [53–56], increase in social and personal knowledge [49, 53], better job prospects [25] and improved overall wellbeing [28] are the common motivators reported by the peers in several studies.”
From Barefoot therapists: barriers and facilitators to delivering maternal mental health care through peer volunteers in Pakistan: a qualitative study (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Withers, M., Browner, C. H., & Aghaloo, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Withers, Mellissa
- Venue
- Journal of Community Health
- Published
- 2012-11-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 374-384
- ISSN
- 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3610
- OpenAlex
- W2008666712
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Community Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Demography › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
- Keywords
- volunteering, global health, medical missions, volunteer motivation, volunteer recruitment, volunteer satisfaction, underserved populations, northern Mexico
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Missions, Mexico, Middle Aged, Motivation, Volunteers, Global Health, Organizational Case Studies, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review