Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lakota Elders’ Views on Traditional Versus Commercial/Addictive Tobacco Use; Oral History Depicting a Fundamental Distinction

Margalit, R., Watanabe-Galloway, S., Kennedy, F., Lacy, N., Red Shirt, K., Vinson, L., Kills Small, J.·2013·Journal of Community Health

Abstract

This qualitative study is intended to elucidate Lakota elders' views on traditional tobacco and commercial/addictive tobacco use, capturing the oral history that depict the cultural protocol regarding traditional tobacco, called Cansasa. Commercial tobacco use has significantly impacted the Northern Plains Indians. National surveillance systems report that tobacco use is more prevalent among American Indian/Alaska Natives than any other population, and is notably higher than the national average. Lung cancer among Native Americans is highest in the Northern Plains and Alaska, where smoking prevalence is also the highest, and smoking is responsible for nearly 90 % of all lung cancer cases. Yet, the use of traditional tobacco is largely ignored by surveillance and seems to have a distinct, positive role. Using a community-based participatory research approach, semi-structured interviews, and qualitative analysis tools, the research team, including 2 Lakota tribe elders, Lakota speaking tribal college students, and university faculty, sought to discern tribal elders' distinctions between traditional and the addictive commercial tobacco. The team interviewed thirty Lakota elders, transcribed the interviews and field notes, and analyzed them using immersion/crystallization organizing framework. The research design engaged the Lakota tribal community in all stages, from planning to publication. Analysis revealed a clear distinction between traditional and commercial tobacco: tribal…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10900-012-9648-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Alford, K. (2012). In J. Macedo, F. Kennedy & J. Weber (Eds.), Family smoking prevention and tobacco control act: Strengthening tribal sovereignty and health. National Native Network.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2005). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 1997–2001. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54(25), 625–628.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2005). Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2004. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54(44), 1121–1124.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2002). Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs—United States, 1995–1999. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(14), 300–303.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  6. Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1153–1188.
  7. Espey, D. K., Wu, X. C., Swan, J., Wiggins, C., Jim, M. A., Ward, E., et al. (2007). Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer, 110(10), 2119–2152. · DOI
  8. High Horse, B. (2004). Traditional versus commercial tobacco. 2004 youth tobacco conference, Pierre, SD.
  9. Kaiser, P. L. (1984). The Lakota sacred pipe: Its tribal use and religious philosophy. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 08(3), 1–26. · DOI
  10. Kills Small, J. (2005). Traditional tobacco. 2005 youth tobacco conference, Rapid City, SD.
  11. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  12. Mails, T. E. (1978). Sundancing at Rosebud and Pine Ridge. Sioux Falls, SD: Center for Western Studies.
  13. McGuire, J. D. (2003). Pipes and smoking customs of the American aborigines: Based on materials in the U. S. national museum. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.
  14. Pego, C. M., Hill, R. F., Solomon, G. W., Chisholm, R. M., & Ivey, S. E. (1995). Tobacco, culture, and health among American Indians: A historical review. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 19(2), 143–164. · DOI
  15. Seig, L. (1971). Tobacco, Peacepipes, and Indians. Palmer Lake, CO: Filter Press.
  16. Stevens, M. (2002). Native American genealogy presentation for the Nourish your family roots workshop. Retrieved February 4, 2012, from http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mikestevens/native_american_genealogy.htm .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Margalit, R., Watanabe-Galloway, S., Kennedy, F., Lacy, N., Red Shirt, K., Vinson, L., & Kills Small, J.
Venue
Journal of Community Health
Published
2013-01-22
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
538-545
ISSN
  • 0094-5145
  • 1573-3610
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review