Project FIT: A school, community and social marketing intervention improves healthy eating among low-income elementary school children
Abstract
Project FIT was a two-year multi-component nutrition and physical activity intervention delivered in ethnically-diverse low-income elementary schools in Grand Rapids, MI. This paper reports effects on children's nutrition outcomes and process evaluation of the school component. A quasi-experimental design was utilized. 3rd, 4th and 5th-grade students (Yr 1 baseline: N = 410; Yr 2 baseline: N = 405; age range: 7.5-12.6 years) were measured in the fall and spring over the two-year intervention. Ordinal logistic, mixed effect models and generalized estimating equations were fitted, and the robust standard errors were utilized. Primary outcomes favoring the intervention students were found regarding consumption of fruits, vegetables and whole grain bread during year 2. Process evaluation revealed that implementation of most intervention components increased during year 2. Project FIT resulted in small but beneficial effects on consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grain bread in ethnically diverse low-income elementary school children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alaimo et al. found taste tests and nutrition education associated with increases in fruit consumption, but not vegetables or other meal components.
“Alaimo and colleagues examined taste tests and nutrition education using digital imagery in six elementary schools in Michigan and found increases in fruit consumption, but not in consumption of vegetables or other meal components [73].”
From Strategies to Improve School Meal Consumption: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Seventeen of the included studies were assessed as high risk of detection bias.
“Seventeen of the included studies were assessed as high risk [26, 28, 37, 41, 43, 44, 46–49, 52, 54–56, 58, 66, 67] and seven studies were assessed as low risk of detection bias [27, 42, 51, 53, 60, 62, 63].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Among studies reporting other continuous implementation outcomes (e.g., quantity of physical activity lessons), findings were mixed.
“Among studies reporting other continuous implementation outcomes (e.g., quantity of physical activity lessons), findings were mixed [43, 44, 46, 48, 49, 59, 64, 66].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
It was unclear in the remaining five nonrandomized studies whether confounders had been sufficiently adjusted for.
“Of the seven nonrandomized studies, three were considered as high risk of confounding [26, 52, 59], while it was unclear in the remaining five studies whether confounders had been sufficiently adjusted for [39, 43, 57, 61, 67].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Just 5 of the 30 studies included in this review examined the impact of implementation occurring "at scale," defined as 50 or more schools.
“just 5 of the 30 studies included in this review (including three targeting implementation of nutrition interventions) examined the impact of implementation occurring “at scale,” defined as 50 or more schools [37, 43, 52, 56, 73].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Alaimo, K., Carlson, J. J., Pfeiffer, K. A., Eisenmann, J. C., Paek, H.-J., Betz, H. H., Thompson, T., Wen, Y., & Norman, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Hanyang University (KR)
- Albion College (US)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alaimo, Katherine
- Venue
- Journal of Community Health
- Published
- 2015-05-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 815-826
- ISSN
- 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3610
- OpenAlex
- W1922181305
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Community Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- healthy eating, low-income children, elementary school students, nutrition interventions, physical activity, social marketing, school community intervention, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grain bread, process evaluation, ethnic diversity, Grand Rapids, Michigan
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Community Participation, Diet, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, School Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Exercise, Social Marketing, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review