Cited by 8Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Voices of Informal Caregivers and Community Stakeholders: Whether and How to Develop an Informal Caregiver Training Program

Open access
Phillips, Sara S., Ragas, Daiva M., Tom, Laura S., Hajjar, Nadia, Dong, XinQi, Simon, Melissa A.·2016·Journal of Community Health

Abstract

Our primary objective was to gather pilot data from caregivers and stakeholders to guide the development of a training program to assist informal caregivers in re-entering the job market. The goal of the program would be to help caregivers rebound from their incurred economic burden by transitioning into a paid caregiving or other health-service role. The economic burden they bear often necessitates a return to the workforce following caregiving; yet the act of returning is complicated by an extended absence from the workforce and a lack of experience in other verifiably skilled and paid roles. We interviewed 37 stakeholders and 25 caregivers of a chronically or terminally ill family member or friend in a suburban collar county close to Chicago. The interview questions considered the economic impact of illness, as well as the feasibility, logistics, and options of a training program for caregivers. Our data gathered from caregivers and leaders within this community support the acceptability of such a training program for informal caregivers, and also provide practical advice for development and implementation related to training cost, length, content, and instructional practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10900-015-0129-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies reported higher resilience associated with higher caregiver preparedness, higher readiness for surrogate decision-making, and lower anxiety and depressive symptoms.

    “Whilst studies examining resiliency and preparedness of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients reported higher resilience associated with higher caregiver preparedness, higher readiness for surrogate decision-making and lower anxiety and depressive symptoms [3, 8, 9]”

    From Preparedness, resilience and unmet needs of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients in a Regional Mission Hospital in Kenya: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction discusses economic resilience through caregiver training, while Methods > Analysis describes an examination of recommendations for that program; neither reports an association between resilience and preparedness, surrogate decision-making readiness, anxiety, or depressive symptoms. Searches for those associations and for advanced cancer caregivers found no relevant passage in our copy. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Wolff JL Kasper JD 2006 Caregiver of frail elders: updating a national profile Gerontologist 46 3 344 56 16731873
  2. [2]Hickey M 1990 What are the needs of families of critically ill patients? A review of the literature since 1976 Heart & Lung 19 4 401 415 2196246
  3. [3]Coleman EA 2003 Falling through the cracks: Challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51 549 555 12657078
  4. [4]Voelker R 2008 IOM: Focus on Care for Aging Population JAMA 299 22 2611 2613 10.1001/jama.299.22.2611 18544715 · DOI
  5. [6]Joo H Dunet DO Fang J Wang G 2014 Cost of informal caregiving associated with stroke among the elderly in the United States Neurology 2014 83 20 1831 7 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000986 Epub 2014 PMC4365923 25305152 · DOI
  6. [7]Joo H Fang H Losby JL Wang G 2015 Cost of Informal Caregiving for Patients with Heart Failure Am Heart J 2015 169 1 142 48.e2 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.010 Epub 2014 PMC4392718 25497259 · DOI
  7. [8]Angioli R Capriglione S Aloisi A 2015 Economic Impact Among Family Caregivers of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015 Epub ahead of print 26270119
  8. [9]Simon MA Gunia B Martin EJ 2013 Path toward economic resilience for family caregivers: mitigating household deprivation and the health care talent shortage at the same time Gerontologist 53 861 873 23633216 PMC3771674
  9. [10]Phillips S Ragas DM Hajjar N Tom LS XinQi D Simon MA 2015 Leveraging the experiences of informal caregivers to create future healthcare workforce options Journal of American Geriatrics Society Accepted, Forthcoming 2015 PMC4721256 26782869
  10. [13]Emanuel EJ Emanuel LL 1998 The promise of a good death Lancet 351 Suppl 2 SII21 29 9606363
  11. [15]Oken MM Creech RH Tormey DC 1982 Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Am J Clin Oncol 5 649 655 7165009
  12. [16]Emanuel RH Emanuel GA Reitschuler EB 2008 Challenges faced by informal caregivers of hospice patients in Uganda J Palliat Med 11 746 753 18588407
  13. [17]Kupczynski L Mundy MA Goswami J Meling V 2014 Cooperative learning in distance learning: a mixed methods study International Journal of Instruction, 2012 5 2 1694–609X

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, S. S., Ragas, D. M., Tom, L. S., Hajjar, N., Dong, X., & Simon, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, Melissa A.
Venue
Journal of Community Health
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
550-556
ISSN
  • 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3610
OpenAlex
W2173792139
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG040690)
  • American Geriatrics Society (Jahnigen Award)
  • John A. Hartford Foundation
  • American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
  • Buehler Center on Aging, Health and Society
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
informal caregivers, caregiver training programs, return to work, economic burden of illness, chronic disease, terminal illness, community stakeholders, training program design, instructional practices
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, Aged, Costs and Cost Analysis, Education, Nonprofessional, Employment, Family, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Caregivers, Home Health Aides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review