Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unhealthy Partnerships: The Tobacco Industry and African American and Latino Labor Organizations

Raebeck, Annaebel, Campbell, Richard, Balbach, Edith·2010·Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Abstract

The tobacco industry in the 1980s began to form relationships with outside groups for assistance on key policy issues due to its own poor credibility in the policy arena. This strategy allowed the industry to advance its own interests while seeming to match the agendas of very different organizations. Between 1988 and 1998, the tobacco industry developed coalitions with the A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI), representing African American trade unionists, and the Labor Coalition on Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), representing Latino trade unionists. APRI and LCLAA each adopted resolutions supporting industry positions on smokefree worksites and excise taxes, issues on which they had not previously taken positions, and promoted these positions to their members, political leaders and the public. They also supported the industry's youth programs. This research relied upon a review of background literature and document searches through the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and Tobacco Documents Online to examine the development of the excise tax coalition. The tobacco industry built support with APRI and LCLAA by framing policy positions in line with the organizations' interests, creating institutional arrangements that circumvented direct funding from the industry, and enhancing the industry's ability to influence excise tax debates indirectly. Although tobacco control advocates do not have the financial resources of the tobacco industry at their disposal, they can learn fro…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10903-009-9269-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Lisovicz N, et al. The deep South Network for cancer control: building a community infrastructure to reduce cancer health disparities. Cancer Suppl. 2006;107:1971–9. · DOI
  2. Jandorf L, et al. Creating alliances to improve cancer prevention and detection among urban medically underserved minority groups: the East Harlem partnership for cancer awareness. Cancer Suppl. 2006;107:2043–51. · DOI
  3. Powe B. Eliminating cancer disparities. Cancer Suppl. 2007;109:345–7. · DOI
  4. Heclo H. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions. In: Dodd L, Jillson C, editors. The dynamics of american politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1994. p. 366–95.
  5. Balbach E, et al. Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the tobacco industry’s Labor management committee. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:985–93. · DOI
  6. Balbach E, Herzberg A, Barbeau E. Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women. J Epi Comm Health Suppl. 2;60:ii27–32 · DOI
  7. Levy D, et al. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2004;10:338–53. · DOI
  8. Pfeffer P, Philip Randolph A. Pioneer of the civil rights movement. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press; 1990.
  9. Korstad R. Civil rights unionism: tobacco workers and the struggle for democracy in the mid-twentieth-century south. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2003. · DOI
  10. Jones W. Simple truths of democracy: African Americans and organized labor in the post-world war II south. In: Arnesen E, editor. The Black worker: a reader. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2007. p. 250–70.
  11. Bates B. Mobilizing Black Chicago: the brotherhood of sleeping car porters and community organizing, 1925–35. In: Arnesen E, editor. The Black worker: a reader. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2007. p. 195–221.
  12. Letters to the Editor––FET. In: UCSF Legacy Library; 1992. 512692912/3032.
  13. Landman A, et al. Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:917–30. · DOI
  14. DiFranza J, McAfee T. The Tobacco institute: helping youth say “yes” to tobacco. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:694.
  15. King G, et al. African Americans’ attitudes toward cigarette excise taxes. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:828–34. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raebeck, A., Campbell, R., & Balbach, E.
Venue
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Published
2009-07-05
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
228-233
ISSN
  • 1557-1912
  • 1557-1920
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review