Cited by 31Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

ANN Prediction of Metabolic Syndrome: a Complex Puzzle that will be Completed

Ivanović, Darko, Kupusinac, Aleksandar, Stokić, Edita, Doroslovački, Rade, Ivetić, Dragan·2016·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has a leading role in the early prevention of chronic disease, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancers and chronic kidney disease. It would be very greatful that MetS diagnosis can be predicted in everyday clinical practice. This paper presents artificial neural network (ANN) prediction of the diagnosis of MetS that includes solely non-invasive, low-cost and easily-obtained diagnostic methods. This solution can extract the risky persons and suggests complete tests only on them by saving money and time. ANN input vectors are very simple and contain solely non-invasive, low-cost and easily-obtained parameters: gender, age, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressures. ANN output is M e t S-coefficient in true/false form, obtained from MetS definition of International Diabetes Federation (IDF). ANN training, validation and testing are conducted on the large dataset that includes 2928 persons. Feed-forward ANNs with 1-100 hidden neurons were considered and an optimal architecture were determinated. Comparison with other authors leads to the conclusion that our solution achieves the highest positive predictive value P P V = 0.8579. Further, obtained negative predictive value N P V = 0.8319 is also high and close to PPV, which means that our ANN solution is suitable both for positive and negative MetS prediction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-016-0601-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanović, D., Kupusinac, A., Stokić, E., Doroslovački, R., & Ivetić, D.
Affiliations
University of Novi Sad (RS)
Corresponding author
Kupusinac, Aleksandar
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2016-10-11
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
264-264
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2530472231
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, artificial neural networks, early diagnosis, non-invasive biomarkers, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, blood pressure, IDF criteria, cardiovascular disease prevention, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, positive predictive value, negative predictive value
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Neural Networks, Computer, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Metabolic Syndrome, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult, Waist-Height Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review