Structured Data Entry in the Electronic Medical Record: Perspectives of Pediatric Specialty Physicians and Surgeons
Open accessAbstract
The Epic electronic health record (EHR) platform supports structured data entry systems (SDES), which allow developers, with input from users, to create highly customized patient-record templates in order to maximize data completeness and to standardize structure. There are many potential advantages of using discrete data fields in the EHR to capture data for secondary analysis and epidemiological research, but direct data acquisition from clinicians remains one of the largest obstacles to leveraging the EHR for secondary use. Physician resistance to SDES is multifactorial. A 35-item questionnaire based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, was used to measure attitudes, facilitation, and potential incentives for adopting SDES for clinical documentation among 25 pediatric specialty physicians and surgeons. Statistical analysis included chi-square for categorical data as well as independent sample t-tests and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Mean scores of the nine constructs demonstrated primarily positive physician attitudes toward SDES, while the surgeons were neutral. Those under 40 were more likely to respond that facilitating conditions for structured entry existed as compared to the two older age groups (p = .02). Pediatric surgeons were significantly less positive than specialty physicians about SDES effects on Performance (p = .01) and the effect of Social Influence (p = .02); but in more agreement that use of forms was voluntary (p = .0…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structured data entry may negatively impact clinical workflows.
“Structured data entry may negatively impact clinical workflows [31]”
Cites
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Adang, L., Vercruysse, J., & Duyck, P. (2008) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me0477 · Cited by 111 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Acceptance of information technologies research has generated many competing models and the operationalization of user acceptance is perspective-dependent [9].”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A large language model for electronic health records
Yang, X., Chen, A., PourNejatian, N., Shin, H. C., Smith, K. E., Parisien, C., Compas, C., Martin, C., Costa, A. B., Flores, M. G., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00742-2 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Interaction time with electronic health records: a systematic review
Pinevich, Y., Clark, K. J., Harrison, A. M., Pickering, B. W., & Herasevich, V. (2021) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1733909 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Trends and perceptions of electronic health record usage among plastic surgeons
Seu, M., Cho, B. H., Pigott, R., Sarmiento, S., Pedreira, R., Bhat, D., & Sacks, J. (2020) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000002709 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sood, N., Stetter, C., Kunselman, A., & Jasani, S. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000428 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bush, R. A., Kuelbs, C., Ryu, J., Jiang, W., & Chiang, G.
- Affiliations
- University of San Diego (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bush, Ruth A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Systems
- Published
- 2017-03-21
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 75-75
- ISSN
- 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-689X
- PMC
- PMC5510605
- OpenAlex
- W2602583982
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K99/R00 HS022404)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- structured data entry, electronic health records, pediatric surgeons, UTAUT, technology acceptance, clinical documentation, data completeness, secondary use of health data, Epic EHR, facilitating conditions, social influence
- MeSH terms
- Pediatricians, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, California, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Chi-Square Distribution, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review