A new approach for brain tumor segmentation and classification based on score level fusion using transfer learning
Abstract
Brain tumor is one of the most death defying diseases nowadays. The tumor contains a cluster of abnormal cells grouped around the inner portion of human brain. It affects the brain by squeezing/ damaging healthy tissues. It also amplifies intra cranial pressure and as a result tumor cells growth increases rapidly which may lead to death. It is, therefore desirable to diagnose/ detect brain tumor at an early stage that may increase the patient survival rate. The major objective of this research work is to present a new technique for the detection of tumor. The proposed architecture accurately segments and classifies the benign and malignant tumor cases. Different spatial domain methods are applied to enhance and accurately segment the input images. Moreover Alex and Google networks are utilized for classification in which two score vectors are obtained after the softmax layer. Further, both score vectors are fused and supplied to multiple classifiers along with softmax layer. Evaluation of proposed model is done on top medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI) challenge datasets i.e., multimodal brain tumor segmentation (BRATS) 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and ischemic stroke lesion segmentation (ISLES) 2018 respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The model for brain tumor detection was finalized after analysis of best-performing methods existing in the literature.
“The model was finalized after the analysis of best-performing methods existing in the literature, such as [43,52,53,58,66].”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., Saba, T., Anjum, M. A., & Fernandes, S. L.
- Affiliations
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- Prince Sultan University (SA)
- National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
- Sahyadri College of Engineering & Management (IN)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Systems
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 326-326
- ISSN
- 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2982185347
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- brain tumor segmentation, brain tumor classification, score-level fusion, transfer learning, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, benign and malignant tumors, multimodal medical image segmentation, BraTS
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review