Cited by 147Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detection

A new approach for brain tumor segmentation and classification based on score level fusion using transfer learning

Amin, Javeria, Sharif, Muhammad, Yasmin, Mussarat, Saba, Tanzila, Anjum, Muhammad Almas, Fernandes, Steven Lawrence·2019·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

Brain tumor is one of the most death defying diseases nowadays. The tumor contains a cluster of abnormal cells grouped around the inner portion of human brain. It affects the brain by squeezing/ damaging healthy tissues. It also amplifies intra cranial pressure and as a result tumor cells growth increases rapidly which may lead to death. It is, therefore desirable to diagnose/ detect brain tumor at an early stage that may increase the patient survival rate. The major objective of this research work is to present a new technique for the detection of tumor. The proposed architecture accurately segments and classifies the benign and malignant tumor cases. Different spatial domain methods are applied to enhance and accurately segment the input images. Moreover Alex and Google networks are utilized for classification in which two score vectors are obtained after the softmax layer. Further, both score vectors are fused and supplied to multiple classifiers along with softmax layer. Evaluation of proposed model is done on top medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI) challenge datasets i.e., multimodal brain tumor segmentation (BRATS) 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and ischemic stroke lesion segmentation (ISLES) 2018 respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-019-1453-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 147

Authors
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., Saba, T., Anjum, M. A., & Fernandes, S. L.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Prince Sultan University (SA)
  • National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
  • Sahyadri College of Engineering & Management (IN)
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
326-326
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2982185347
Cited by
147
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
brain tumor segmentation, brain tumor classification, score-level fusion, transfer learning, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, benign and malignant tumors, multimodal medical image segmentation, BraTS
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review