Cited by 403Medical Practices and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-being

Prevention of Work Disability Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Challenge of Implementing Evidence

Loisel, Patrick, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Hazard, Rowland, Keller, Robert, Scheel, Inger, van Tulder, Maurits, Webster, Barbara·2005·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background The process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges.Purpose and methods A literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results.Conclusion The current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies indicate that in addition to workers' personal factors, environmental factors such as job characteristics, work modifications, involved stakeholders, and the compensation system are of upmost importance for SAW and RTW.

    “Recent studies indicate that in addition to workers' personal factors (workers' characteristics, health, and medical care), environmental factors such as job characteristics, work modifications, involved stakeholders, and the compensation system are of upmost importance for SAW and RTW [54-56].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 403

Authors
Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., & Webster, B.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Cabrini Hospital (AU)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (US)
Corresponding author
Loisel, Patrick
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2005-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
507-524
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W2137150643
Cited by
403
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
work disability prevention, musculoskeletal disorders, return to work, implementation of evidence, implementation barriers, absenteeism, stakeholder engagement, vocational rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Canada, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Occupational Health Services, United States, Sick Leave, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review