Cited by 161Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Second-generation minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for monoclonal antibodies

Open access
Cao, Yanguang, Balthasar, Joseph P., Jusko, William J.·2013·Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Abstract

Minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) models provide a sensible modeling approach when fitting only plasma (or blood) data yielding physiologically-relevant PK parameters that may provide more practical value than parameters of mammillary models. We propose a second-generation mPBPK model specifically for monoclonal antibodies (mAb) by including (lumping) several essential components of mAb PK used in full PBPK models. These components include convection as the primary mechanism of antibody movement from plasma into tissues and return to plasma with interstitial fluid as the major extravascular distribution space. The model divides tissue spaces into two groups according to their vascular endothelial structure, leaky and tight, which consequently allows discernment of two types and general sites of distribution. This mPBPK model was applied to two mAbs in mice and ten mAbs with linear kinetics in humans. The model captured their plasma PK profiles well with predictions of concentrations in interstitial fluid for two types of tissues. Predictions of tissue concentrations for mAb 7E3 and 8C2 were consistent with actual measurements in mice, indicating the feasibility of this model in assessing extravascular distribution in the two categories of tissues. The vascular reflection coefficients (σ1) of tight tissues (Vtight) ranged 0.883–0.987 and coefficients (σ2) for leaky tissues (Vleaky) ranged 0.311 to 0.837. The plasma clearance (CLp) varied among the mAbs in humans from 0.0054 to 0.03 L/h. In addition, applying this model generates parameters for mAb transcapillary escape rates and assesses major sites of elimination. Four of ten mAbs exhibited better fitting statistics premised on elimination from interstitial fluid than from plasma. This approach allows comparisons of mAb PK when only plasma data are available, provides more realistic parameters and predictions than mammillary models, and may provide an intermediate step towards utilizing full PBPK models for mAbs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10928-013-9332-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 161

Authors
Cao, Y., Balthasar, J. P., & Jusko, W. J.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Jusko, William J.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Published
2013-08-31
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
597-607
ISSN
  • 1567-567X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8744
OpenAlex
W1985770955
Cited by
161
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 57980, R01GM057980)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
monoclonal antibodies, interstitial fluid, convection, transcapillary escape rate, plasma clearance, linear kinetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Biological Transport, Humans, Kinetics, Models, Biological, Tissue Distribution, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review