Developmental Mentoring Match Characteristics: Correspondence between Mentors’ and Mentees’ Assessments of Relationship Quality
Abstract
Understanding the factors that contribute to high-quality mentoring relationships is critical to developing and sustaining effective mentoring programs. In study 1, sixty-three adolescent mentors, from two high schools, were surveyed four to six weeks after being matched with elementary-age mentees. Hierarchical regression models revealed that mentees' academic and behavioral risk status, parental involvement, and program quality all explained variance in mentor-perceived relationship quality, but none remained significant predictors after mentors' self-efficacy, motivations for self-enhancement, and assessments of their mentees' support seeking behaviors were accounted for. Study 2 cross-validates the regression model in study 1 and examines the concurrent validity and predictive validity of a measure of mentoring match characteristics using mid-year and end-of-year assessments from mentees and mentors. Editors' Strategic Implications: The focus on mentors' initial impressions of their mentees and the relationship represents a novel contribution to the study of relationship formation and persistence. The authors provide a promising strategy - and descriptions of specific measures - to help programs study relationships that endure or terminate. Coordinators will benefit from the knowledge that if mentors feel efficacious and if the mentoring relationship is strong, mentors are more likely to persist.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Volunteers who have had previous experience with helping youth may feel a stronger sense of efficacy, a variable that has been consistently associated with better match outcomes.
“Volunteers who have had previous experience with helping youth may feel a stronger sense of ef fi cacy, a variable that has been consistently associated with better match outcomes (e.g., Karcher et al. 2005).”
From The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Karcher et al. 2005
Programs that promote mentees' parents' involvement through family events demonstrate greater peer mentor satisfaction and longer match duration.
“programs that promote mentees ' parents ' involvement through family events (Karcher et al., 2005), and that incorporate both individual and larger group mentoring activities (Herrera et al., 2008), demonstrate greater peer mentor satisfaction and longer match duration.”
From Cross-age peer mentoring for youth: A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Karcher et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Karcher, M. J., Nakkula, M. J., & Harris, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karcher, Michael J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Primary Prevention
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-110
- ISSN
- 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6547
- OpenAlex
- W2114446833
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- mentoring relationships, mentor-mentee matching, relationship quality, elementary school students, parental involvement, support seeking, relationship persistence, mentoring program evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Mentors, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Urban Population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review