Cited by 11Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Effects of a three-tiered intervention model on physical activity and fitness levels of elementary school children

Dauenhauer, Brian, Keating, Xiaofen, Lambdin, Dolly·2016·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

Response to intervention (RtI) models are frequently used in schools to tailor academic instruction to the needs of students. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using RtI to promote physical activity (PA) and fitness in one urban elementary school. Ninety-nine students in grades 2-5 participated in up to three tiers of intervention throughout the course of one school year. Tier one included 150 min/week of physical education (increased from 90 min/week the previous year) and coordinated efforts to improve school health. Tier two consisted of 30 min/week of small group instruction based on goal setting and social support. Tier three included an after-school program for parents and children focused on healthy living. PA, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition were assessed before and after the interventions using pedometers, a 20-m shuttle run, and height/weight measurements. From pre- to post-testing, PA remained relatively stable in tier one and increased by 2349 steps/day in tier two. Cardiovascular fitness increased in tiers one and two by 1.17 and 1.35 ml/kg/min, respectively. Although body mass index did not change, 17 of the 99 students improved their weight status over the course of the school year, resulting in an overall decline in the prevalence of overweight/obesity from 59.6 to 53.5 %. Preliminary results suggest that the RtI model can be an effective way to structure PA/health interventions in an elementary school setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-016-0430-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 11

Authors
Dauenhauer, B., Keating, X., & Lambdin, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Colorado (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Dauenhauer, Brian
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2016-04-08
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
313-327
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2313121648
Cited by
11
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
Response to Intervention, physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, elementary school students, school health promotion, physical education, goal setting, social support, after-school programs, parental involvement, overweight and obesity, pedometers, urban schools
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Obesity, Physical Education and Training, Physical Fitness, School Health Services, Schools, Exercise, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review