Cited by 35Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Measuring the Direct and Spillover Effects of Body Worn Cameras on the Civility of Police–Citizen Encounters and Police Work Activities

Braga, Anthony A., Barao, Lisa M., Zimmerman, Gregory M., Douglas, Stephen, Sheppard, Keller·2020·Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10940-019-09434-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 35

Authors
Braga, A. A., Barao, L. M., Zimmerman, G. M., Douglas, S., & Sheppard, K.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Braga, Anthony A.
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Published
2019-10-19
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
851-876
ISSN
  • 0748-4518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7799
OpenAlex
W2980561677
Cited by
35
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Quantitative Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
body-worn cameras, spillover effects, police-citizen encounters, police use of force, citizen complaints, police discretion, Boston Police Department, police accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review