Effectiveness of cognitive/behavioral small group intervention for reduction of depression and stress in non-hispanic white and hispanic/latino women dementia family caregivers: outcomes and mediators of change
Open accessAbstract
This study enrolled 184 middle-aged and older women (95 Non-Hispanic White and 89 Hispanic/Latino) who provided in-home hands-on care to an elderly relative with Alzheimer's disease or another form of dementia. Within ethnic group they were randomly assigned to either a CBT-based small group intervention program called "Coping with Caregiving" (CWC) that taught a variety of cognitive and behavioral skills to reduce stress and depression, or to a minimal telephone based control condition (TSC). Intervention lasted about 4 months; one post-treatment assessment was completed 6 months after baseline by interviewers blind to the intervention condition. Interviews and interventions were conducted in English or Spanish by trained staff. Results indicated that those in the CWC (regardless of ethnicity) showed greater improvement from pre to post intervention than those in the TSC on measures of depressive symptoms, overall life stress, and caregiving-specific stress. In order to investigate if these changes may have been related to one proposed mechanism of change in CBT (skill utilization), a new measure was constructed. Change in frequency of use and perceived helpfulness of adaptive coping skills were assessed in all caregivers. Results indicated that caregivers in CWC reported greater frequency of use, and greater perceived helpfulness, of these skills at post intervention compared to caregivers in the TSC. Improvement measured by dependent measures was correlated with an increase in these indices for those in the CWC. Tests for mediation suggest that effective skill utilization may mediate the effect of treatment on outcome. Implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations provided for future research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies from Asian, African, and South American countries were scarce, although a few studies directly addressed the effects of ethnic background on the efficacy of interventions.
“Although there were a few studies that directly addressed the effects of ethnic background on the efficacy of interventions (Belle et al. , 2006; GallagherThompson et al. , 2008), studies from Asian, African, and South American countries were scarce.”
From Which interventions work for dementia family carers?: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials of carer interventions. (2018) · cites this paper as Gallagher-Thompson et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Gallagher-Thompson, D., Gray, H. L., Dupart, T., Jimenez, D., & Thompson, L. W.
- Affiliations
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gallagher-Thompson, Dolores
- Venue
- Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
- Published
- 2008-11-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 286-303
- ISSN
- 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6563
- PMC
- PMC4111260
- OpenAlex
- W1997953793
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG018784)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH073553)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- dementia caregivers, Alzheimer's disease, family caregivers, cognitive behavioral therapy, small group intervention, caregiver depression, caregiver stress, Hispanic/Latino women, non-Hispanic white women, ethnic differences, coping strategies, skill utilization, mediation, home care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review