CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Complicated grief treatment: an evidence-based approach to grief therapy

Shear, M. Katherine, Gribbin Bloom, Colleen·2017·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
DOI 10.1007/s10942-016-0242-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-016-0242-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 69

Authors
Shear, M. K., & Gribbin Bloom, C.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Shear, M. Katherine
ORCID
Shear, M. Katherine
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-05-24
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
6-25
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
DOI
10.1007/s10942-016-0242-2
OpenAlex
W2401478574
Cited by
69
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH60783)
  • Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs of the Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-2-0043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
complicated grief, bereavement, grief therapy, acceptance of loss, session structure, cognitive behavioral therapy, case examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review