Metacognition, Mindfulness Attention Awareness, and Their Relationships with Depression and Anxiety
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excessive self-reflection and self-awareness are integral facets of dysfunctional metacognition.
“Excessive self-reflection and self-awareness are integral facets of dysfunctional metacognition [21, 74, 75], thus having a significant focus on a certain time perspective may aid in these processes.”
From Association between time perspective and metacognition among Lebanese adults: the mediating role of mindfulness (2023) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Aldahadha, B.
- Affiliations
- Mutah University (JO)
- Corresponding author
- Aldahadha, Basim
- ORCID
- Aldahadha, Basim
- Venue
- Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-200
- ISSN
- 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6563
- OpenAlex
- W3045650993
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Keywords
- metacognition, depression, anxiety, metacognitive beliefs, cognitive confidence, need for control, cognitive self-consciousness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
