Cited by 393Neural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and Algorithms

Why Does Deep and Cheap Learning Work So Well?

Open access
Lin, Henry W., Tegmark, Max, Rolnick, David·2017·Journal of Statistical Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10955-017-1836-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Every Gaussian transformation on N modes can be decomposed into a CV circuit containing only the basic Gaussian gates (rotation, displacement, squeezing, and beamsplitter).

    “Every Gaussian transformation on N modes [Eq.( 7)] can be decomposed into a CV circuit containing only the basic gates mentioned above.”

    From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [49]

  • Deeper neural networks can be more powerful and more efficient than shallower networks with the same number of parameters.

    “While the original theorems showed that two layers were sufficient for universal function approximation, deeper networks can be more powerful and more efficient than shallower networks with the same number of parameters [57][58][59].”

    From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

  • The connection between translationally invariant Hamiltonians and convolutional networks was also noted in Ref. [59].

    “The connection between translationally invariant Hamiltonians and convolutional networks was also noted in Ref. [59].”

    From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

  • In the phase space picture, the symplectic transformation M H generated by H is obtained via the rule M H = exp( H ), where is the symplectic form from Eq. (8).

    “In the phase space picture, the symplectic transformation M H generated by H is obtained via the rule [49] M H = exp( H ),”

    From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, H. W., Tegmark, M., & Rolnick, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Henry W.
Venue
Journal of Statistical Physics
Published
2017-07-21
Volume
168
Issue
6
Pages
1223-1247
ISSN
  • 0022-4715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9613
OpenAlex
W2511261638
Cited by
393
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 11
FWCI
29.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Statistical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
deep learning, neural network efficiency, function approximation, symmetry, locality, compositionality, information theory, renormalization group, linear neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review