Cited by 119Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Comparison of the posttraumatic stress disorder scale versus the clinician‐administered posttraumatic stress disorder scale in domestic violence survivors

Open access
Griffin, Michael G., Uhlmansiek, Mary H., Resick, Patricia A., Mechanic, Mindy B.·2004·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

The posttraumatic diagnostic scale (PDS) is a self-report instrument for PTSD that is simple to administer and has demonstrated good psychometric properties. We compared the PDS with the gold standard clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS) diagnostic interview for PTSD. We assessed 138 women who were victims of domestic violence using both the PDS and the CAPS. Findings confirmed that PTSD develops at a high base rate in this sample. The PDS generally performed well in relation to the CAPS although with a tendency to overdiagnose PTSD. The findings lend further support to the use of the PDS as a diagnostic tool for PTSD but indicate that it is better at identifying survivors with PTSD than those without the disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10960-004-5798-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffin, M. G., Uhlmansiek, M. H., Resick, P. A., & Mechanic, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
Corresponding author
Griffin, Michael G.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
497-503
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2171946997
Cited by
119
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-55542, R01MH055542)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, domestic violence, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, diagnostic accuracy, overdiagnosis, women survivors, PTSD prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Diagnosis, Differential, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review