Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Active versus passive academic networking: evidence from micro-level data

Goel, Rajeev K., Grimpe, Christoph·2013·The Journal of Technology Transfer

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10961-011-9236-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. J. (1997). Entrepreneurship, geographic spillovers, and university research: A spatial econometric approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. BMBF. (Eds.). (2009). Studie zur Deutschen Beteiligung am 6. Forschungsrahmenprogramm der Europäischen Union. Bonn/Berlin.

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Goel, R. K., & Grimpe, C.
Venue
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2011-10-16
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
116-134
ISSN
  • 0892-9912
  • 1573-7047
Cited by
21
References
41
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active versus passive academic networking: evidence from micro-level data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10961-011-9236-5
The paper
Goel, R. K., & Grimpe, C. (2013). Active versus passive academic networking: evidence from micro-level data. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9236-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.