Cited by 84Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEducation Discipline and Inequality

Is educational achievement a turning point for incarcerated delinquents across race and sex?

Blomberg, Thomas G., Bales, William D., Piquero, Alex R.·2012·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Research has linked the role of education to delinquency, but much of the focus has been on general population samples and with little attention to demographic differences. Employing a cumulative disadvantage framework that integrates elements of informal social control and labeling theories, this article examines whether academic achievement serves as a positive turning point and re-directs juvenile delinquents away from subsequent offending. Attention is also given to race/sex contingencies. Using a sample of 4,147 delinquents released from Florida correctional institutions (86% male, 57% non-White, average age at release = 16.8 years), propensity score analysis yielded two findings: youth with above average academic achievement while incarcerated were significantly more likely to return to school post-release, and youth with above average attendance in public school were significantly less likely to be re-arrested in the 1-year post-release period. While the academic gains were pronounced among African-American males, the preventive effects of school attendance are similar across race and sex, suggesting that education can be a part of a larger prevention effort that assists juvenile delinquents in successful community re-entry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-011-9680-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blomberg, T. G., Bales, W. D., & Piquero, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Blomberg, Thomas G.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2011-06-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
202-216
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2068382988
Cited by
84
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
juvenile delinquency, academic performance, school attendance, recidivism, rearrest, cumulative disadvantage, informal social control, labeling theory, African American men, race and sex differences, community reentry
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Black or African American, Educational Status, Female, Florida, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Prisoners, Schools, Self Concept, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review