Cited by 226Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceBullying, Victimization, and AggressionStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Correlates of Cyber Dating Abuse Among Teens

Zweig, Janine M., Lachman, Pamela, Yahner, Jennifer, Dank, Meredith·2014·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Recent advancements in technology (e.g., social networking, texting) have created new ways for dating youth to relate to one another, including in abusive ways via "cyber dating abuse." Cyber dating abuse is a form of teen dating violence that overlaps with other types of abuse (e.g., psychological) but also has several unique characteristics. Given the phenomenon's limited presence in dating violence literature, we focus on identifying how experiencing cyber dating abuse relates to youths' individual behaviors and experiences (e.g., substance use, sexual activity), psychosocial adjustment, school connection, family relationships, and partner relationships. A total of 3,745 youth (52% female, 74% White) in three northeastern states participated in the survey and reported currently being in a dating relationship or having been in one during the prior year. We found that experiences of cyber dating abuse were most significantly correlated with being female, committing a greater variety of delinquent behaviors, having had sexual activity in one's lifetime, having higher levels of depressive symptoms, and having higher levels of anger/hostility. Further, cyber dating abuse appeared somewhat more strongly related to depressive symptoms and delinquency than did other forms of teen dating violence and abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Path B is characterized by pressure, threats, or manipulation by same-age partners to obtain sexual images or interactions, often embedded in dating dynamics and broader cyber-dating abuse.

    “It is characterized by pressure, threats, or manipulation by same-age partners to obtain sexual images or interactions, often embedded in dating dynamics and broader cyber-dating abuse (2, 30, 31).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zweig, J. M., Lachman, P., Yahner, J., & Dank, M.
Affiliations
Urban Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Zweig, Janine M.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2013-11-07
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1306-1321
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2014914418
Cited by
226
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Colorado College
  • National Institute of Justice
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
cyber dating abuse, adolescent dating violence, adolescents, substance use, sexual activity, depressive symptoms, anger-hostility, delinquency, psychosocial adjustment, school connectedness, family relationships, couple relationships, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Courtship, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Violence, Models, Statistical, Crime Victims, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review