Cited by 66Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

Internalizing Symptoms and Externalizing Problems: Risk Factors for or Consequences of Cyber Victimization?

Holfeld, Brett, Mishna, Faye·2019·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Experiences of traditional victimization often co-occur with cyber victimization in adolescence but are not always controlled for when considering how cyber victimization is uniquely related to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. This is particularly problematic in longitudinal studies that attempt to determine the longitudinal associations between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms, and between cyber victimization and externalizing problems and how these patterns may differ for adolescent boys and girls. In the current study, traditional victimization was controlled to examine the longitudinal sequences of association between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms, and between cyber victimization and externalizing problems for adolescent boys and girls. Participants included 510 seventh and tenth grade students (M age = 13.7, 61.6% girls, 44% Asian and 30% White) who completed surveys across three academic years in middle and high school. Findings from longitudinal path models suggest that internalizing symptoms and externalizing problems respectively were associated with increases in experiences of cyber victimization (beyond the effect of traditional victimization) both within and across time, particularly for adolescent girls. Efforts to address adolescents' experiences of cyber victimization must consider the vulnerabilities created by adolescents' continued internalizing symptoms and externalizing problems that may differ for boys and girls. Implications for cyber victimization prevention and intervention efforts are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-018-0974-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 66

Authors
Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Holfeld, Brett
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
567-580
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2905334567
Cited by
66
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
SSHRC (410-2011-1001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
cyber victimization, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, adolescents, gender differences, longitudinal associations, middle and high school students
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Canada, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Students, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review