Internalizing Symptoms and Externalizing Problems: Risk Factors for or Consequences of Cyber Victimization?
Abstract
Experiences of traditional victimization often co-occur with cyber victimization in adolescence but are not always controlled for when considering how cyber victimization is uniquely related to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. This is particularly problematic in longitudinal studies that attempt to determine the longitudinal associations between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms, and between cyber victimization and externalizing problems and how these patterns may differ for adolescent boys and girls. In the current study, traditional victimization was controlled to examine the longitudinal sequences of association between cyber victimization and internalizing symptoms, and between cyber victimization and externalizing problems for adolescent boys and girls. Participants included 510 seventh and tenth grade students (M age = 13.7, 61.6% girls, 44% Asian and 30% White) who completed surveys across three academic years in middle and high school. Findings from longitudinal path models suggest that internalizing symptoms and externalizing problems respectively were associated with increases in experiences of cyber victimization (beyond the effect of traditional victimization) both within and across time, particularly for adolescent girls. Efforts to address adolescents' experiences of cyber victimization must consider the vulnerabilities created by adolescents' continued internalizing symptoms and externalizing problems that may differ for boys and girls. Implications for cyber victimization prevention and intervention efforts are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Holfeld, Brett
- Venue
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence
- Published
- 2018-12-17
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 567-580
- ISSN
- 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6601
- OpenAlex
- W2905334567
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- SSHRC (410-2011-1001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Keywords
- cyber victimization, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, adolescents, gender differences, longitudinal associations, middle and high school students
- MeSH terms
- Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Canada, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Students, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review