Cited by 121Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivations for Social Media Use: Associations with Social Media Engagement and Body Satisfaction and Well-Being among Adolescents

Open access

Abstract

Adolescents are spending considerable time on social media, yet it is unclear whether motivations for social media use drive different forms of social media engagement, and their relationships with body satisfaction and well-being. This study tested a proposed model of the relationships between motivations for social media use, types of social media engagement and body satisfaction and well-being. Responses to an online survey from 1432 Australian adolescents (M age = 13.45 years, SD = 1.14, range 11-17; 55.4% boys) were collected. Structural equational modelling indicates excellent model fit. Specifically, motivations for social media use (information sharing, passing time, escapism, social interaction, social capital and appearance feedback) were associated with engagement (intensity, photo-based use, active use, passive use and liking use) and revealed mixed associations with body satisfaction and well-being. The findings support the importance of considering motivations for social media use in future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-020-01390-z

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carlisle, E., Fildes, J., Hall, S., Perrens, B., Perdriau, A., & Plummer, J. (2019). Youth survey report. Sydney, NSW: Mission Australia.
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Jarman, H. K., Marques, M. D., McLean, S. A., Slater, A., & Paxton, S. J.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Jarman, Hannah K.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2021-01-21
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
2279-2293
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W3123492860
Cited by
121
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9
FWCI
25.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP170100709)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
social media use, motivations for social media use, social media engagement, body satisfaction, well-being, adolescents, escapism, social interaction, social capital, information sharing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review