The development of post-traumatic stress symptoms among adolescents who experience cyber and traditional victimization over time
Abstract
Adolescents' experiences of bullying victimization are positively associated with their post-traumatic stress symptoms. The development of these symptoms alongside experiences of bullying victimization over time, however, are not well understood. The current study used a transactional theory of development to examine the bidirectional associations between adolescents' post-traumatic stress symptoms and experiences of cyber and traditional victimization across three academic years. Participants were 510 Canadian students in grade 7 or 10 (M age = 13.7, 61.6% girls) who completed surveys annually. The findings show that adolescents' concurrent experiences of cyber and traditional victimization were uniquely associated with their post-traumatic stress symptoms. Over time, greater post-traumatic stress symptoms were associated with more experiences of cyber and traditional victimization among adolescent boys and girls. Prevention and intervention efforts must address the role of post-traumatic stress symptoms that may limit adolescents' ability to develop or maintain healthy relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has noted many negative psychological consequences associated with online victimization including post-traumatic stress, diminished self-esteem, and mental health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, suicide ideation, and self-harm.
“Beyond the school context, research has noted many negative psychological consequences associated with online victimization including post-traumatic stress (102), diminished self-esteem (103), and mental health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, suicide ideation, self-harm (104).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Holfeld, Brett
- Mishna, Faye
- Venue
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence
- Published
- 2021-01-30
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2339-2350
- ISSN
- 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6601
- OpenAlex
- W3123879285
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2011-1001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- posttraumatic stress symptoms, cyberbullying, traditional bullying, bullying victimization, adolescents, bidirectional relationship, longitudinal development, gender differences, prevention and intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Students, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review