Cited by 0Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Structure-based inference of molecular functions of proteins of unknown function from Berkeley Structural Genomics Center

Shin, Dong Hae, Hou, Jingtong, Chandonia, John-Marc, Das, Debanu, Choi, In-Geol, Kim, Rosalind, Kim, Sung-Hou·2007·Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics

Abstract

Advances in sequence genomics have resulted in an accumulation of a huge number of protein sequences derived from genome sequences. However, the functions of a large portion of them cannot be inferred based on the current methods of sequence homology detection to proteins of known functions. Three-dimensional structure can have an important impact in providing inference of molecular function (physical and chemical function) of a protein of unknown function. Structural genomics centers worldwide have been determining many 3-D structures of the proteins of unknown functions, and possible molecular functions of them have been inferred based on their structures. Combined with bioinformatics and enzymatic assay tools, the successful acceleration of the process of protein structure determination through high throughput pipelines enables the rapid functional annotation of a large fraction of hypothetical proteins. We present a brief summary of the process we used at the Berkeley Structural Genomics Center to infer molecular functions of proteins of unknown function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10969-007-9025-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structure is more informative of function than sequence and structure is encoded by sequence.

    “Although structure is more informative of function than sequence 57,58 and structure is encoded by sequence, predicting structure remains hard, particularly due to the relative paucity of structural relative to sequence data.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36

Authors
Shin, D. H., Hou, J., Chandonia, J.-M., Das, D., Choi, I.-G., Kim, R., & Kim, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Sung-Hou
Venue
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
Published
2007-09
Volume
8
Issue
2-3
Pages
99-105
ISSN
  • 1345-711X (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-0267
OpenAlex
W261672133
Cited by
0
References
36
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm073109-08)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM073109, GM62412, P50GM062412)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein function prediction, proteins of unknown function, structural genomics, protein 3D structure, functional annotation, hypothetical protein
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Trees, Humans, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Genomics, Structural Homology, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review