Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 53Science Education and PedagogyStudent Assessment and FeedbackEvolution and Science Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction

Gottheiner, Daniel M., Siegel, Marcelle A.·2012·Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

Using a framework of assessment literacy that included teachers’ view of learning, knowledge of assessment tools, and knowledge of assessment interpretation and action taking, this study explored the assessment literacy of five experienced middle school teachers. Multiple sources of data were: teachers’ predictions about students’ ideas, students’ written and verbal responses to assessment tasks, teacher background questionnaire, and a videotaped teacher focus group. We investigated middle school teachers’ predictions, interpretations, and recommended actions for formative assessment in genetics. Results documented a variety of ways that teachers would elicit students’ ideas in genetics, focusing on discussion strategies. Findings showed how well teachers predicted student conceptions compared to actual student conceptions. We also found that teachers mostly described general topics they would use to address students’ alternative conceptions. Less often, they explained specific content they would use to challenge ideas or pedagogical strategies for conceptual change. Teachers also discussed barriers to addressing ideas. Teacher professional development should provide more support in helping teachers close the formative assessment cycle by addressing conceptions that are elicited with assessments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. AbellSKAbellSKLedermanNGResearch on science teacher knowledgeHandbook of research on science education2007Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum11051149
  2. Abell S. K. & Siegel M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In D. Corrigan J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.) The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205–221). London UK: Springer. · DOI
  3. BellBAbellSKLedermanNGClassroom assessment of science learningHandbook of research on science education2007Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum11051149
  4. BellBCowieBFormative assessment in science education2001The NetherlandsKluwer
  5. 10.1002/tea.3660280103 · DOI
  6. BlackPAtkinJMCoffeyJEThe importance of everyday assessmentEveryday assessment in the classroom2003Arlington, VANational Science Teachers Association Press112
  7. Science content standards for California1998Sacramento, CACalifornia State Board
  8. CareyMAMorseJThe group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group researchCritical issues in qualitative research methods1994Thousand Oaks, CASage225241
  9. 10.1080/00219266.1978.9654169 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/sce.3730760504 · DOI
  11. Ed-Data. (2002). Fiscal demographic and performance data on California’s K-12 schools. In Alameda County Office of Education California Department of Education Edsource and Fiscal Crisis of Management Assistance Team (Eds.) Education data partnership (online). Available: http://www.ed-data.kI2.ca.us/welcome.asp May 10 2004.
  12. 10.1080/00219266.1985.9654757 · DOI
  13. 10.4135/9781412990028 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/10627197.2006.9652990 · DOI
  15. HatchJADoing qualitative research in education settings2002New YorkState University of New York Press
  16. HuntEBMinstrellJMcGillyKA cognitive approach to the teaching of physicsClassroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice1994CambridgeMIT Press/Bradford Books
  17. 10.1080/00219266.1980.10668980 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/0950069980200303 · DOI
  19. KreugerRACaseyMAFocus group interviews: A practical guide for applied research2000Thousand Oaks, CASage
  20. LanninJAbellSArbaughFChvalKFriedrichsenPVolkmannMResearching teacher knowledge: Further delineating the PCK construct for science and mathematics education2008New York, NYAmerican Educational Research Association
  21. MagnussonSJBorkoHKrajcikJSGess-NewsomeJLedennanNNature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teachingExamining pedagogical content knowledge1999Boston, MAKluwer95132
  22. MertlerCAAssessing student performance: A descriptive study of the classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachersEducation1999120285296
  23. 10.1002/sce.10092 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/tea.20073 · DOI
  25. National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
  26. PattonMQQualitative research and evaluation methods20023Thousand Oaks, CASage
  27. PellegrinoJWChudowskyNGlaserRKnowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment2001Washington, DCNational Academy Press
  28. 10.1080/02635140120046240 · DOI
  29. PophamWJClassroom assessment: What teachers need to know1999Boston, MAAllyn & Bacon
  30. 10.1002/tea.20163 · DOI
  31. SmithDCNealeDCBrophyJThe construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teachingAdvances in research on teaching1991Greenwich, CTJAI Press187243
  32. Stiggins R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning (electronic version). Kappan.http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0206sti.htm. · DOI
  33. 10.1187/cbe.02-03-0007 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s10972-007-9084-1 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis Hillel Day School655 Brotherhood Way94132-2901San FranciscoCAUSA
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
531-557
ISSN
  • 1046-560X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1847
OpenAlex
W2072379502
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
assessment literacy, middle school science teachers, genetics education, student conceptions, misconceptions, formative assessment, conceptual change, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.