Cited by 15Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsPhase Change Materials ResearchAdsorption and Cooling Systems

Exergoeconomic analysis of photovoltaic thermal systems based on phase change materials and natural zeolites for thermal management

Open access
Kandilli, Canan, Uzel, Mert·2021·Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

Abstract

Conventional photovoltaic thermal (PVT) systems provide unstable thermal energy, which changes throughout the day. In PVT systems, phase change materials (PCMs) and heat storage materials could be used to make thermal energy more stable and provide longer-term thermal energy. In the present study, exergoeconomic analysis of PVT systems integrated with natural zeolites has been firstly carried out, and the results were compared with the results of PVT systems integrated with PCM and conventional one. PVT systems integrated with paraffin and stearic acid, common PCMs and conventional PVT systems were analyzed by specific exergy costing method, systems were compared exergoeconomically and suggestions were made to improve the economic performance of PVT systems. As a result of the analyzes conducted with 297 data obtained experimentally, the average energy efficiencies were calculated as 33%, 40%, 37% and 32% for paraffin, natural zeolite, stearic acid and conventional PVT system, respectively. Besides, average exergy efficiencies were 24%, 24%, 22% and 22% for paraffin, zeolite, stearic acid and conventional PVT system, respectively. The average entropy generation of the PVT based paraffin; natural zeolite, stearic acid and conventional one were found as 2.11, 2.29, 2.18 and 2.07 W K-1, respectively. According to the exergoeconomic analysis, specific exergy flow cost values were found as 0.206, 0.176, 0.204 and 0.206 € kWh-1 for the PVTs based on paraffin, natural zeolite, stearic acid and the conventional PVT. It was concluded that the natural zeolite-based PVT system was found as the best system exergoeconomically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10973-021-10574-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 15

Authors
Kandilli, C., & Uzel, M.
Affiliations
Usak University (TR)
Corresponding author
Kandilli, Canan
Venue
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Published
2021-02-07
Volume
145
Issue
3
Pages
1373-1384
ISSN
  • 1388-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2926
OpenAlex
W3126847514
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
TUBITAK (214M615)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
photovoltaic-thermal systems, phase change materials, natural zeolite, exergoeconomic analysis, thermal energy storage, alkanes, stearic acid, exergy efficiency, entropy production, specific exergy costing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review