CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interpreting realized pollen flow in terms of pollinator travel paths and land-use resistance in heterogeneous landscapes

Lander, Tonya A., Klein, Etienne K., Stoeckel, Solenn, Mariette, Stéphanie, Musch, Brigitte, Oddou-Muratorio, Sylvie·2013·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9920-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-013-9920-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, Cane J, Cox PA, Dalton V, Feinsinger P, Ingram M, Inouye D, Jones EC, Kennedy K, Kevan P, Koopowitz H, Medellin R, Medellin-Morales S, Nabhan GP, Pavlik B, Tepedino V, Torchio P, Walker S (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv Biol 12(1):8–17 · DOI
  2. Bell W (1990) Searching behaviour patterns in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 35:447–467 · DOI
  3. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carvell C, Jordan WC, Bourke AFG, Pickles R, Redhead JW, Heard MS (2012) Molecular and spatial analyses reveal links between colony-specific foraging distance and landscape-level resource availability in two bumblebee species. Oikos 121(5):734–742 · DOI
  5. Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang WG, Marrazzo MT, Peterlunger E, Testolin R (1999) AC/GT and AG/CT micosatellite repeats in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch): isolation, characterization and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor Appl Genet 99:65–72 · DOI
  6. Cottrell JE, Vaughan SP, Connolly T, Sing L, Moodley DJ, Russell K (2009) Contemporary pollen flow, characterization of the maternal ecological neighbourhood and mating patterns in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity 103:118–128 · DOI
  7. Cranmer L, McCollin D, Ollerton J (2012) Landscape structure influences pollinator movements and directly affects plant reproductive success. Oikos 121(4):562–568 · DOI
  8. Dirlewanger E, Capdeville G, Tauzin Y, Cosson P, Claverie J (2008) A Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) linkage map and its comparison to other Prunus species. In: Burak M, Lang GA, Gulen H, Ipek A (eds) Proceedings of the Vth international cherry symposium, vols 1 and 2, Acta Horticulturae. pp 115–126
  9. Doerr VAJ, Barrett T, Doerr ED (2011) Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: a response to Hodgson et al. J Appl Ecol 48(1):143–147 · DOI
  10. Downey S, Iezzoni A (2000) Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125:76–80 · DOI
  11. Dyer RJ, Chan DM, Gardiakos VA, Meadows CA (2012) Pollination graphs: quantifying pollen pool covariance networks and the influence of intervening landscape on genetic connectivity in the North American understory tree, Cornus florida L. Landsc Ecol 27:239–251 · DOI
  12. Fortuna MA, Garcia C, Guimaraes PR, Bascompte J (2008) Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. Ecol Lett 11(5):490–498 · DOI
  13. Guitian P, Guitian J, Navarro L (1993) Pollen transfer and diurnal versus nocturnal pollination in Lonicera etrusca. Acta Oecol Int J Ecol 14(2):219–227
  14. Hagerty BE, Nussear KE, Esque TC, Tracy CR (2011) Making molehills out of mountains: landscape genetics of the Mojave Desert tortoise. Landsc Ecol 26(2):267–280 · DOI
  15. Hodges C, Miller R (1981) Pollinator flight directionality and the assessment of pollen returns. Oecologia 50:376–379 · DOI
  16. Jacobs JH, Clark SJ, Denholm I, Goulson D, Stoate C, Osborne JL (2009) Pollination biology of fruit-bearing hedgerow plants and the role of flower-visiting insects in fruit-set. Ann Bot 104(7):1397–1404 · DOI
  17. Jolivet C, Holtken AM, Liesebach H, Steiner W, Degen B (2012) Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in four contrasting wild cherry populations (Prunus avium L.). Eur J For Res 131:1055–1069 · DOI
  18. Jones E, Dornhaus A (2011) Predation risk makes bees reject rewarding flowers and reduce foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1505–1511 · DOI
  19. Joobeur T, Periam N, Vicente M, King G, Arus P (2000) Development of a second generation linkage map for almond using RAPD and SSR markers. Genome 43:649–655 · DOI
  20. Jules ES, Shahani P (2003) A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J Veg Sci 14(3):459–464 · DOI
  21. Klein EK, Carpentier FH, Oddou-Muratorio S (2011) Estimation of the whole variance of male fecundity from genotypes of progeny arrays: accuracy and limits of the Bayesian forward approach. Methods Ecol Evol 2:349–361 · DOI
  22. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vázquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10(4):299–314 · DOI
  23. Lander TA, Bebber DP, Choy CTL, Harris SA, Boshier DH (2011) The circe principle explains how resource-rich land can waylay pollinators in fragmented landscapes. Curr Biol 21(15):1302–1307 · DOI
  24. Lavergne S, Thuiller W, Molina J, Debussche M (2005) Environmental and human factors influencing rare plant local occurrence, extinction and persistence: a 115-year study in the Mediterranean region. J Biogeogr 32:799–811 · DOI
  25. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On the optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609 · DOI · Paper page
  26. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of Island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  27. Meagher T (1986) Analysis of paternity within natural population of Chamaelirium luteum 1. Identification of most-likely male parent. Am Nat 128:199–215 · DOI
  28. Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503–2515 · DOI
  29. Ohashi K, Thomson J (2005) Efficient harvesting of renewing resources. Behav Ecol 16:592–605 · DOI
  30. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pullinger MG, Johnson CJ (2010) Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landsc Ecol 25(10):1547–1560 · DOI
  32. Rands S, Whitney H (2011) Field margins, foraging distances and their impacts on nesting pollinator success. PLoS One 6(10):e25971 · DOI
  33. Ray N (2005) PATHMATRIX: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol Ecol Notes 5(1):177–180 · DOI
  34. Richard Y, Armstrong DP (2010) Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data. J Appl Ecol 47(3):603–610 · DOI
  35. Richards S, Williams N, Harder L (2009) Variation in pollination: causes and consequences for plant reproduction. Am Nat 174:382–398 · DOI
  36. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158(1):87–99 · DOI
  37. Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522 · DOI
  38. Romero G, Antiqueira P, Koricheva J (2011) A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour. PLoS One 6(6):e20689 · DOI
  39. Russell K (2003) EUFORGEN technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for wild cherry (Prunus avium). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, p 6
  40. Sonneveld T, Tobutt KR, Robbins TP (2003) Allele-specific PCR detection of sweet cherry self-incompatibility (S) alleles S1 to S16 using consensus and allele-specific primers. Theor Appl Genet 107(6):1059–1070 · DOI
  41. Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin MJ, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19(17):3576–3591 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Stoeckel S, Grange J, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Bilger I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Mariette S (2006) Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species—Prunus avium L. Mol Ecol 15(8):2109–2118 · DOI
  43. Stoeckel S, Klein E, Oddou-Muratorio S, Musch B, Mariette S (2012) Microevolution of S-allele frequencies in wild cherry populations: respective impacts of negative frequency dependent selection and genetic drift. Evolution 66:486–504 · DOI
  44. Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I, Dettori MT, Pancaldi M, Sansavini S (2000) Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43:512–520 · DOI
  45. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landsc Ecol 15(7):633–641 · DOI
  46. Vandermeer J, Carvajal R (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am Nat 158(3):211–220 · DOI
  47. Vaughan SP, Boskovic RI, Gisbert-Climent A, Russell K, Tobutt KR (2008) Characterisation of novel S-alleles from cherry (Prunus avium L.). Tree Genet Genomes 4(3):531–541 · DOI
  48. Winker K, Rappole J, Ramos M (1995) The use of movement data as an assay of habitat quality. Oecologia 101:211–216 · DOI
  49. Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2008) Foraging distance in Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie 39:419–427 · DOI
  50. Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol 27(6):777–797 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Lander, T. A., Klein, E. K., Stoeckel, S., Mariette, S., Musch, B., & Oddou-Muratorio, S.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-07-31
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1769-1783
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-013-9920-y
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review