CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study

Zeller, Katherine A., McGarigal, Kevin, Beier, Paul, Cushman, Samuel A., Vickers, T. Winston, Boyce, Walter M.·2014·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-9991-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-014-9991-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk.

    “For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”

    From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, and mortality risk have well-established and fundamental importance in shaping movement patterns.

    “For example, these models do not account for autocorrelation, spatial scale of movement, or mortality risk, despite the well-established and fundamental importance these factors have in shaping movement patterns5,35–37.”

    From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [37]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Addicott JF, Aho JM, Antolin MF, Padilla DL, Richardson JS, Soluk DA (1987) Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49:340–346 · DOI
  2. Boyce MS (2006) Scale for resource selection functions. Divers Distrib 12:269–276 · DOI
  3. Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300 · DOI
  4. Brown DD, LaPoint S, Kays R, Heidrich W, Kummeth F, Wilelski M (2012) Accelerometer-informed GPS telemetry: reducing the trade-off between resolution and longevity. Wildl Soc Bull 36:139–146 · DOI
  5. Compton BW, Rhymer JM, McCollough M (2002) Habitat selection by wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta): an application of paired logistic regression. Ecology 83:833–843 · DOI
  6. Dalziel BD, Morales JM, Fryxell JM (2008) Fitting probability distributions to animal movement trajectories: using artificial neural networks to link distance, resources, and memory. Am Nat 172:248–258 · DOI
  7. DeCesare NJ, Hebblewhite M, Schmiegelow F, Hervieux D, McDermid GJ, Neufeld L, Bradley M, Whittington J, Smith KG, Morgantini LE, Wheatley M, Musiani M (2012) Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. Ecol Appl 22:1068–1083 · DOI
  8. Dickson BG, Beier P (2002) Home-range and habitat selection by adult cougars in southern California. J Wildl Manag 66:1235–1245 · DOI
  9. Dickson BG, Jenness JS, Beier P (2005) Influence of vegetation, topography, and roads on cougar movement in southern California. J Wildl Manag 69:264–276 · DOI
  10. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bollinger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Shröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100:125–136 · DOI
  12. Frair JL, Fieberg J, Hebblewhite M, Cagnacci F, DeCesare NJ, Pedrotti L (2010) Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2187–2200 · DOI
  13. Fritz H, Said S, Weimerskirch H (2003) Scale-dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long-range foraging seabird. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1143–1148 · DOI
  14. Hawkins BA, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, De Marco P, Blackburn TM (2007) Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology. Ecography 30:375–384 · DOI
  15. Holland JD, Bert DG, Fahrig L (2004) Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitat. Bioscience 54:227–233 · DOI
  16. Johnson CJ, Nielsen SE, Merrill EH, McDonald TL, Boyce MS (2006) Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretic motivation and evaluation methods. J Wildl Manag 70:347–357 · DOI
  17. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation—trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673 · DOI
  18. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H MacArthur Award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967 · DOI
  19. Lewis JS, Rachlow JL, Garton EO, Vierling LA (2007) Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error. J Appl Ecol 44:663–671 · DOI
  20. Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1:255–268 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Manly BF, McDonald L, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
  22. Martin AE, Fahrig L (2012) Measuring and selecting scales of effect for landscape predictors in species-habitat models. Ecol Appl 22:2277–2292 · DOI
  23. Meyer CB, Thuiller W (2006) Accuracy of resource selection functions across spatial scales. Divers Distrib 12:288–297 · DOI
  24. Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsinger KE, Fyxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85:2436–2445 · DOI
  25. Norththrup JM, Hooten MB, Anderson CR Jr, Wittemyer G (2013) Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology 94:1456–1463 · DOI
  26. Patterson TA, Thomas L, Wilcox C, Ovaskainen O, Matthiopoulos J (2008) State-space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol Evol 23:87–94 · DOI
  27. Pullinger MG, Johnson CJ (2010) Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landscape Ecol 25:1547–1560 · DOI
  28. Rettie WJ, McLoughlin PD (1999) Overcoming radio telemetry bias is habitat-selection studies. Can J Zool 77:1175–1184 · DOI
  29. Ruth TK, Buotte PC, Quigley HB (2010) Comparing ground telemetry and global positioning system methods to determine cougar kill rates. J Wildl Manag 74:1122–1133 · DOI
  30. Squires JR, DeCesare NJ, Olson LE, Kolbe JA, Hebblewhite M, Parks SA (2013) Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery. Biol Conserv 157:187–195 · DOI
  31. Sweanor LL, Logan KA, Bauer JW, Millsap B, Boyce WM (2008) Puma and human spatial and temporal use of a popular California state park. J Wildl Manag 72:1076–1084 · DOI
  32. Wheatley M (2010) Domains of scale in forest-landscape metrics: implications for species-habitat modeling. Acta Oecol 36:259–267 · DOI
  33. Wheatley M, Johnson C (2009) Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scale. Ecol Complex 6:150–159 · DOI
  34. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Wilmers CC, Wang Y, Nickel B, Houghtaling P, Shakeri Y, Allen ML, Kermish-Wells J, Yovovich V, Williams T (2013) Scale dependent behavioral responses to human development by a large predator, the puma. PLoS ONE 8:e60590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060590 · DOI
  36. Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zeller, K. A., McGarigal, K., Beier, P., Cushman, S. A., Vickers, T. W., & Boyce, W. M.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-01-31
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
541-557
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-014-9991-4
Cited by
123
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review