Cited by 92Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Application of abductive ILP to learning metabolic network inhibition from temporal data

Open access
Tamaddoni-Nezhad, Alireza, Chaleil, Raphael, Kakas, Antonis, Muggleton, Stephen·2006·Machine Learning

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10994-006-8988-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ILP has been applied to modelling inhibition in metabolic networks.

    “modelling inhibition in metabolic networks (Tamaddoni-Nezhad et al., 2006)”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Tamaddoni-Nezhad et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Watson, J.D. (1994). Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing, Inc., third edition.
  2. Alm, E., & Arkin, A.P. (2003). Biological networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13(2), 193-202.
  3. Alves, R., Chaleil, R.A., & Sternberg, M.J. (2002). Evolution of enzymes in metabolism: a network perspective. Mol. Biol., 320(4), 751-70.
  4. Crockford, D.J., Keun, H.C., Smith, L.M., Holmes, E., & Nicholson, J.K. (2005). Curve-fitting method for di- rect quantitation of compounds in complex biological mixtures using 1h nmr: Application in metabonomic toxicology studies. Anal. Chem., 77(14), 4556-4562.
  5. Friedman, N., Murphy, K., & Russell, S. (1998). Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference (UAI-1998), (pp. 139-147), San Francisco, CA.
  6. Goodwin, B.C. (1963). Oscillatory organization in cells, a dynamic theory of cellular control processes. Academic Press, New York.
  7. Harstshorne, C., Weiss, P., & Burks, A., editors. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.
  8. Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Free Press, New York.
  9. Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E., & Thagard, P.R. (1989). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learn- ing and Discovery. MIT Press.
  10. Inoue, K. (2001). Induction, abduction and consequence-finding. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP01), (pp. 65-79). Springer-Verlag.
  11. Inoue, K. (2001). Inverse entailment for full clausal theories. In: LICS-2001 Workshop on Logic and Learning.
  12. Ito, K., & Yamamoto, A., (1998). Finding hypotheses from examples by computing the least generlisation of bottom clauses. In: Proceedings of Discovery Science '98, (pp. 303-314). Springer.
  13. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z.N., & Barabasi, A.L. (2000). The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407(6804), 651-654.
  14. Josephson, J.R., & Josephson, S.G., editors. (1994). Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technol- ogy. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Kakas, A.C., & Sadri, F. editors, Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Part I, number 2407, (pp. 402-436).
  16. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., & Toni, F. (1993). Abductive Logic Programming. Journal of Logic and Com- putation, 2(6), 719-770.
  17. Moyle, S.A. (2000). An investigation into Theory Completion techniques in Inductive Logic Programming. PhD thesis, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, University of Oxford.
  18. Moyle, S., & Muggleton, S.H. (1997). Learning programs in the event calculus. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Inductive Logic Programming Workshop (ILP97), LNAI 1297, (pp. 205-212). Springer-Verlag.
  19. Moyle, S. (2002). Using theory completion to learn a robot navigation control program. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, (pp. 182-197). Springer-Verlag.
  20. Muggleton, S.H., & Bryant, C.H. (2000). Theory completion using inverse entailment. In: Proc. of the 10th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-00), (pp. 130-146), Berlin. Springer- Verlag.
  21. Muggleton, S.H., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., & Watanabe, H. (2003). Induction of enzyme classes from biological databases. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, (pp. 269-280). Springer-Verlag.
  22. Muggleton, S., & De Raedt, L. (1994). Inductive logic programming: Theory and methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 19(20), 629-679.
  23. Muggleton, S. (1991). Inductive logic programming. New Generation Computing, 8(4), 295-318.
  24. Nicholls, A.W., Holmes, E., Lindon, J.C., Farrant, R.D., Haselden, J.N., Damment, S.J.P., Waterfield, C.J., & Nicholson, J.K. (2001). Metabonomic investigations into hydrazine toxicity in the rat. Chemical Research in. Toxicology, 14(8), 975-987.
  25. Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W., Bono, H., & Kanehisa, M. (1999). KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 27(1), 29-34.
  26. Papin, J.A., Price, N.D., Wiback, S.J., Fell, D.A., & Palsson, B.O. (2003). Metabolic pathways in the post- genome era. Trends Biochem. Sci., 28(5), 250-8.
  27. Peirce, C.S. (1957). Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Liberal Arts Press.
  28. Ravasz, E., Somera, A.L., Mongru, D.A., Oltvai, Z.N., & Barabasi, A.L. (2002). Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science, 297(5586), 1551-5.
  29. Ray, O., Broda, K., & A. Russo. (2003). Hybrid Abductive Inductive Learning: a Generalisation of Progol. In: 13th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, volume 2835 of LNAI, (pp. 311-328). Springer Verlag.
  30. Świerkosz, T.A., Jordan, L., McBride, M., McGough, K., Devlin, J., & Botting, R. M. (2002). Actions of paracetamol on cyclooxygenases in tissue and cell homogenates of mouse and rabbit. Med Sci Monit, 8(12), 496-503.
  31. Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Kakas, A., Muggleton, S.H., & Pazos, F. (2004). Modelling inhibition in metabolic pathways through abduction and induction. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, (pp. 305-322). Springer-Verlag.
  32. Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Muggleton, S., & Bang, J. (2003). A bayesian model for metabolic pathways. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI03) Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, (pp. 50-57). IJCAI.
  33. Wellner, B.R. (1999). An abductive-inductive learning framework for logic-based agents. Master's thesis, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine.
  34. Yamamoto, A., & Fronhöfer, B. (2001). Finding hypotheses by generalizing residues hypotheses. In: Pro- ceedings of the International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP01), Springer-Verlag (pp. 107-118).
  35. Yamamoto, A. (1997). Which hypotheses can be found with inverse entailment? In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, Berlin. LNAI 1297 (pp. 296-308).
  36. Zimmerman, H. J., & Maddrey, W. C. (1995). Acetaminophen (paracetamol) hepatotoxicity with regular intake of alcohol: analysis of instances of therapeutic misadventure. Hepatology, 22(3), 767-773.
  37. Zupan, B., Bratko, I., Demsar, J., Juvan, P., Halter, J.A., Kuspa, A., & Shaulsky, G. (2003). Genepath: a system for automated construction of genetic networks from mutant data. Bioinformatics, 19(3), 383-389.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Chaleil, R., Kakas, A., & Muggleton, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
64
Issue
1-3
Pages
209-230
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W2135498576
Cited by
92
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
Imperial College London
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
enzyme inhibition, metabolic networks, drug side effect prediction, NMR metabolomics, rat urine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review