The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilabel classification via calibrated label ranking
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754
Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334029 · Cited by 2,412
Cited by
Deep Learning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification
Liu, J., Chang, W.-C., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080834 · Cited by 676
A Neural Candidate-Selector Architecture for Automatic Structured Clinical Text Annotation.
Singh, G., Marshall, I. J., Thomas, J., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Wallace, B. C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3132847.3132989 · Cited by 11
Wang, H., Xu, Y., Chen, Q., & Wang, X. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01824-y · Cited by 9
Singh, G., Sabet, Z., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Thomas, J. (2021) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53352-6_12 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., Loza Mencía, E., & Brinker, K.
- Venue
- Machine Learning
- Published
- 2008-08-06
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-153
- ISSN
- 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0565
- OpenAlex
- W2166912588
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.