Cited by 48Infant Development and Preterm CareFamily and Disability Support ResearchEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Birth Characteristics Associated With Early Intervention Referral, Evaluation for Eligibility, and Program Eligibility in the First Year of Life

Abstract

Objectives The Individual with Disabilities Education Act mandates Early Intervention (EI) services for infants and toddlers with developmental delay. We assessed the percentage of infants at risk for developmental delay due to characteristics present at birth who were referred to Massachusetts EI within 1 year of birth, evaluated for eligibility, and eligible for services. In addition, we identified birth characteristics that independently predicted 0-1 year program referral, evaluation, and eligibility. Methods The Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system linked birth certificate, hospital discharge, and EI program data of 219,037 infants born in Massachusetts, 1998-2000. Multivariate logistic regressions identified independent infant predictors of referral, evaluation, and eligibility. Results Of 219,037 births, 14,852 (6.8%) were referred to EI within 1 year. Birthweight Conclusion EI referral and evaluation are high among infants born at risk for delay in Massachusetts. Some characteristics not included in the state's high-risk definition (e.g. birthweight 1200-1499 g) were identified that predicted referral. Most referrals were eligible for services. Results demonstrate the value to states of using linked population and program data for program evaluation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-006-0080-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PELL system serves as the primary population model for successfully linking existing systems for developmental monitoring and Child Find purposes.

    “The PELL system serves as the primary population model for successfully linking existing systems for developmental monitoring and Child Find purposes”

    From A Systematic Review of Part C Early Identification Studies (2018) · cites this paper as Clements et al., 2006

  • The Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) Data System from Massachusetts met criteria for a model system for children from general population (primary) settings.

    “The Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) Data System from Massachusetts was identified from published reports that included all the key data points in the model for children from general population (primary) settings”

    From A Systematic Review of Part C Early Identification Studies (2018) · cites this paper as Clements et al., 2006

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ulrich DA, Ulrich BD, Angulo-Kinzler RM, Yun J. Treadmill training of infants with Down syndrome: evidence-based developmental outcomes. Pediatrics 2001;108(5):e84. · DOI
  2. Calderon R, Greenberg M. The effectiveness of early intervention for deaf children and children with hearing loss. In: Guralnick M, editor. The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes; 1997.
  3. Dawson G, Osterling J. Early intervention in autism. In: Guralnick M, editor. The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes; 1997.
  4. Berlin LJ, Brooks-Gunn J, McCarton C, McCormick MC. The effectiveness of early intervention: examining risk factors and pathways to enhanced development. Prev Med 1998;27(2):238–45. · DOI
  5. Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Early intervention and early experience. Am Psychol 1998;53(2):109–20. · DOI
  6. Gardner JM, Walker SP, Powell CA, Grantham-McGregor S. A randomized controlled trial of a home-visiting intervention on cognition and behavior in term low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2003;143(5):634–9. · DOI
  7. Campbell FA, Pungello EP, Miller-Johnson S, Burchinal M, Ramey CT. The development of cognitive and academic abilities: growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Dev Psychol 2001;37(2):231–42. · DOI
  8. Wasik BH, Ramey CT, Bryant DM, Sparling JJ. A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: project CARE. Child Dev 1990;61(6):1682–96. · DOI
  9. Melnyk BM, Alpert-Gillis L, Feinstein NF, Johnson J, Fairbanks E, Small L, Rubenstein J, Slota M, Corbo-Richert B. Improving cognitive development of low-birth-weight premature infants with the COPE program: A pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. Res Nurs Health 2001;24(5):373–89. · DOI
  10. Scarborough AA, Spiker D, Mallik S, Hebbeler K, Bailey DB, Simeonsson R. A national look at children and families entering early intervention. Except Child 2004;70(47):469–71. · DOI
  11. Buysse V, Bernier KY, McWilliam RA. A statewide profile of early intervention services using the Part C data system. J Early Interv 2002;25(1):15–26. · DOI
  12. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston: PWS-Kent; 1988.
  13. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157(4):364–75. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ, Verter J, Temprosa M, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, Fanaroff AA, Stark A, Carlo W, Tyson JE, Donovan EF, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2001;107(1):E1.
  15. Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(3):488–92.
  16. Lee JS, Polin RA. Treatment and prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Neonatol 2003;8(6):449–59. · DOI
  17. Mailloux R, Curry SL. The outcome of triplet pregnancies at Hartford Hospital—1989–1996. Conn Med 1997;61(4):203–6.
  18. Yokoyama Y, Shimizu T, Hayakawa K. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in twins, triplets and quadruplets. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24(5):943–8. · DOI
  19. Suri K, Bhandari V, Lerer T, Rosenkrantz TS, Hussain N. Morbidity and mortality of preterm twins and higher order multiple births. J Perinatol 2001;21(5):293–9. · DOI
  20. Kaufman GE, Malone FD, Harvey-Wilkes KB, Chelmow D, Penzias AS, D’Alton ME. Neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with triplet pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91(3):342–8. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clements, K. M., Barfield, W. D., Kotelchuck, M., Lee, K. G., & Wilber, N.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Clements, Karen M.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2006-05-19
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
433-441
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2162082816
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (S3485-23/23, S1887-21/23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
early intervention, developmental delay, infants and toddlers, birth weight, low birth weight, birth characteristics, high-risk infants, triplet births, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Massachusetts
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Disability Evaluation, Eligibility Determination, Humans, Infant, Massachusetts, Medical Record Linkage, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Early Intervention, Educational, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review